0
patterns
bottom up
Wiki User
∙ 16y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are advantages and disadvantages of truth table?
Advantages of truth tables are that they provide a clear and systematic way to represent all possible input-output combinations in a logic circuit. However, a disadvantage is that they become complex and unwieldy for circuits with a large number of inputs or outputs, making them difficult to interpret and analyze effectively.
What are Deductive and Inductive argument means?
Deductive reasoning is drawing a specific conclusion from general principles or premises that are known to be true. It aims to provide certainty in the conclusion. Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, involves making generalizations or probabilistic conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. It aims to provide strong support for the conclusion without guaranteeing absolute certainty.
What is it that makes an argument inductive?
An argument is inductive if its premises provide evidence that supports the conclusion but does not guarantee its truth. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. The strength of an inductive argument depends on the quality and relevance of the evidence provided.
How do people create inductive arguments?
People create inductive arguments by organizing the strongest possible support for a contention. Inductive arguments do not offer absolute proof, but they offer evidence in support of a point that cannot be proven through deductive reasoning.
What should inductive arguments never be characterized as?
Inductive arguments should never be characterized as guaranteeing truth or absolute certainty. This is because inductive reasoning relies on specific examples to draw general conclusions, which are probabilistic and open to revision based on new evidence.
Does classical Aristotelian logic apply only to inductive arguments?
no
Observations that are collected and which support or suggest a conclusion, are known as?
Inductive arguments
Observations that are collected and which support or suggest a conclusion are known as?
Inductive arguments
What are observations that are collected and which support or suggest a conclusion are known as?
Inductive arguments
What are the parts of a inductive argument?
An inductive argument is one in which the conclusion follows probably from the premises. For example: 1. Felix is a cat. 2. Most cats like to play with mice 3. Felix (probably) likes to play with mice Remember, in inductive arguments, its possible that the conclusion is false even if the premises are true.
What are the distinguished features of cogent and uncogent arguments?
Both are inductive arguments, cogent is strong with all true premises, uncogent is either weak, or strong but with one or more false premises or both.
Inductive reasoning is empirical in nature which means that it is based on?
Inductive reasoning use theories and assumptions to validate observations. It involves reasoning from a specific case or cases to derive a general rule. The result of inductive reasoning are not always certain because it uses conclusion from observations to make generalizations. Inductive reasoning is helpful for extrapolation, prediction, and part to whole arguments.
