It will have travelled 4*60 = 240 miles
Distance does not affect time. At very high speeds - close to the speed of light - speed does make time go slower. This is the Lorentz time-dilation.
He is traveling at approximately 7.25 units per hour.
They are related through the formula distance = time x velocity (assuming constant velocity).
Assuming constant speed, you are supposed to divide the distance by the time.
The formula for constant speed is: distance = speed x time Solving for time, it turns out that you simply have to divide distance by speed.
Not necessarily. The distance a car travels is determined by its speed and the time it spends traveling. If a car is traveling at a slower speed but for a longer period of time, it may not cover as much distance as a car traveling at a faster speed but for a shorter period of time. So, the longest time does not always correspond to the greatest distance traveled.
constant speed
(Its speed) x (time it spends traveling).
This all depends on what city you're traveling from, and what city you're traveling to, but the distance is approximately 9,000 miles.
Assuming you mean Nashville, TN to London, England, the distance is approximately 4200 miles.
Assuming the rate of 60 mph is constant, traveling 60 mph means you are traveling one mile per minute. Since 45 seconds is 3/4 of a minute, you have traveled 3/4 of a mile, or3,960 feet
Approximately 177 miles traveling on CA-299.
Distance does not affect time. At very high speeds - close to the speed of light - speed does make time go slower. This is the Lorentz time-dilation.
No. In general, for the simplified case of constant speed, use the formula: distance = speed x time
He is traveling at approximately 7.25 units per hour.
They are related through the formula distance = time x velocity (assuming constant velocity).
No. In general, for the simplified case of constant speed, use the formula: distance = speed x time