answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No, 144 and 165 are not relatively prime. For them to be relatively prime, the number 1 could be their only common factor, but they also have 3 as a common factor.

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Are 144 and 165 relatively prime numbers?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Are 54 and 165 relatively prime?

No, 54 and 165 are not relatively prime.


Are 56 and 165 relatively prime why?

Yes, they are relatively prime.


Are 20 88 and 165 relatively prime?

yes, they are relatively prime.


Are 99 and 165 relatively prime?

no


Is 99 and 165 relatively prime?

No


What is the GCF of 99 and 165 and are they relatively prime?

The GCF is 33, which means they are not relatively prime.


Are 56 and 165 relatively prime?

Yes.


What three prime numbers when multiplied come to 165?

Numbers 3.5 and 11. The numbers are actually prime factors of 165 (165=3*5*11).


Are 99 and 165 relatively prime why not?

No, they are both divisible by 3.


What is the prime factorization of 165 using prime numbers?

3 x 5 x 11 = 165


What two consecutive whole numbers that square root 165 lies between?

√144 < √165 < √169 12 < √165 < 13


How do you find the prime factorization of 165?

3 * 5 * 11 = 165 Divide by prime numbers until you get a final prime number