0
No because they are both composite numbers that have more than two factors.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are 63 and 117 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Is 56 and 63 relatively prime?
No.
Are 36 and 44 relatively prime?
No.
Are 63 and 56 relatively prime?
Yes. Their only common factor is 1.
What is the greatest common factor of 21 and 44?
The GCF of 21 and 44 is 1. The only proper divisors of 21 are 3 and 7. The only proper divisors of 44 are 2,4 and 11. So, could it be that there are no common factors? No! We forgot about 1 which is a divisor of every number. 1 is the only common factor of 21 and 44, so it has to be the greatest. Rule: if nothing else divides two numbers the greatest common factor is 1. We say such numbers are relatively prime to each other. 21 is relatively prime to 44 and 44 is relatively prime to 21 but neither number is prime. Exercise : Prove : If p and q are two different primes, then p and q are relatively prime.
Are 63 and 117 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Is 72 and 63 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Are 63 and 74 relatively prime?
No, 63 and 74 are not relatively prime because they have a common factor of 1.
Is 143 and 63 relatively prime?
Yes, 143 and 63 are relatively prime because they have no prime factors in common.
Are 21 and 44 relatively prime?
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Are 40 and 63 relatively prime numbers?
ya they are relatively prime
Is 56 and 63 relatively prime?
No.
Are 56 and 63 a relatively prime?
No, they are not.
Are 52 and 63 relativly prime?
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Are 36 and 44 relatively prime?
No.
What is a relatively prime number for 43?
44
What are examples of relatively prime numbers?
30 and 63 are relatively prime numbers. The factors of 30 are 1, 2, 3, 5, and 30, and the factors of 63 are 1, 7, 9, and 63. Two or more numbers are relatively prime if 1 is their only common factor.
