0
Best Answer
They are not relatively prime
No. To be relatively prime they could only have the number 1 as a common factor, but they have other common factors.
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoThis answer is:
Add your answer:
Earn +20 ptsQ: Are 98 and 140 relatively prime?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
Continue Learning about Other Math
Are 22 and 64 relatively prime?
22 is not relatively prime
What is seven tenths of 140?
98
Are 20 88 and 165 relatively prime?
yes, they are relatively prime.
Are 62 and 121 relatively prime?
Yes, 62 and 121 are relatively prime
Is 210 and 211 relatively prime?
211 is a prime number, and is not a factor of 210, so yes, they are relatively prime.
Related questions
Is 112 and 140 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Are 16 and 98 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Is 94 and 98 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Is 11 and 98 relatively prime?
Yes. 11 is prime. 98 is not prime, but it is not divisible by 11, so the two are relatively prime.
Are 11 and 98 relatively prime?
11 and 98 are relatively prime. Their only common factor is 1.
Are 112 and 140 relatively prime?
No, they are not.
Is 25 and 98 are relatively prime numbers?
25 and 98 are not prime numbers
Is 98 and 77 relatively prime?
No.
Is 98 and 343 relatively prime?
No.
What is the prime factorization of 98 140?
2 x 7 x 7 = 98 2 x 2 x 5 x 7 = 140
What is the Greatest Common Factor using prime factorization of 98 and 140?
it is 14
Is 13 an 98 relatively prime?
Yes. The only common factor they have is 1.
Copyright ©2024 Infospace Holdings LLC, A System1 Company. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Answers.