Loading...

No. Perfect squares as the squares of the integers, whereas irrational squares as the squares of irrational numbers, but some irrational numbers squared are whole numbers, eg √2 (an irrational number) squared is a whole number.

They are perfect squares.

They are called perfect squares.

All their roots are whole numbers.

They are the perfect squares.

perfect squares

Very rarely. Square roots are only whole numbers for perfect squares.

81. They are the perfect squares of numbers starting from 5.81. They are the perfect squares of numbers starting from 5.81. They are the perfect squares of numbers starting from 5.81. They are the perfect squares of numbers starting from 5.

Yes. Not only that, they are counting numbers.

no, integers are whole numbers, 1, 3, 56, etc. not 4.4, 2.7

there are no perfect numbers instead there are perfect cubes, perfect squares, natural numbers, whole numbers, integers, rational numbers, irrational numbers, and real numbers. If you want natural no. they are 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29.

Yes he did. One very interesting one is called Galileo's paradox which shows that there are as many perfect squares as there are whole numbers, even though most numbers are not perfect squares. There are other contributions as well.

1,4,9. Any number that is an integer squared. So 2x2 is a perfect square. Any whole number times itself.

All of the whole numbers from 1 to 300 are not perfect squares, except for1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100, 121, 144, 169, 196, 225, 256, and 289.In addition to the whole numbers not listed above, several of the decimalsand mixed numbers from 1 to 300 are also not perfect squares.

Two. 36, and 49 are perfect squares.

None. Perfect squares, by definition, are the squares of counting numbers and these cannot be fractions.

It does not matter! There are more numbers that are not perfect squares than there are perfect squares and the universe has not ground to a screeching halt!

yes

Yes, they are.

square numbers.

No.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theoremNo.First of all, you can't write negative numbers as sums of perfect squares at all - since all perfect squares are positive.Second, for natural numbers (1, 2, 3...) you may need up to 4 perfect squares: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrange's_four-square_theorem

Every integer is a rational number, and some integers are perfect squares. These are the only rational numbers to have an integral square root.

Counting numbers multiplied by themselves.

The square roots of perfect squares are the numbers that when squared create perfect squares as for example 36 is a perfect square and its square root is 6 which when squared is 36

perfect squares