They are commutative if you find that putting your shoes on first and then your socks gives the same result as putting your socks on first and then the shoes. If it is not the same, then the activities are not commutative.
No
No, the noun pair is a singular noun that can be the subject of a sentence or a clause. The noun pair can also be the object of a verb or a preposition. The plural form is pairs. Examples:subject: A pair of shoes was left on the back steps.direct object: She wore two pairs of socks because the boots were too big.object of a preposition: He is one of a pair of twins.
4 x 4 = 16
Hell nah
No. The non-mathematical definitions for "commutative" involve exchanging or converting in some fashion. The socks and shoes don't qualify there. Applying the mathematical formula would mean that putting on a sock and shoe would be the same as putting on a shoe and sock.
Multiplication and addition of ordinary numbers is commutative: 2 + 3 = 3 + 2 = 5 5 * 7 = 7 * 5 = 35 It would be easy to jump to the conclusion that 'everything' is. But operations on clothes aren't: put on socks + put on shoes = ok put on shoes + put on socks = not so ok
Try putting a not used tea bag or fill your shoes with cat litter not used of course
Four shoes and three socks.
There are numerous websites that provide information about running shoes socks. See the following for additional information about running shoes socks: www.runnersworld.com Running Shoes & Gear Apparel & Socks
Shoes sandals socks slippers
It means that you're putting socks on.
No Of course not. Like sperry topsiders, boat shoes = no socks.
Socks
shoes, coat, bra, makeup, socks
Because when people says shoes and socks it sounds better then socks and shoes......even if it doesn't make any sense......thats the human brain for you.