Study guides

Q: Can two consecutive whole numbers whole numbers be prime?

Write your answer...

Submit

Related questions

2 and 3 are prime numbers.

Consecutive whole numbers will have an odd sum. Consecutive odd numbers, or consecutive prime numbers, will be 29 and 31.

no

In fact, they can. 2 and 3 are consecutive prime numbers.For larger numbers, one of two consecutive numbers will always be even, and therefore, not a prime.In fact, they can. 2 and 3 are consecutive prime numbers.For larger numbers, one of two consecutive numbers will always be even, and therefore, not a prime.In fact, they can. 2 and 3 are consecutive prime numbers.For larger numbers, one of two consecutive numbers will always be even, and therefore, not a prime.In fact, they can. 2 and 3 are consecutive prime numbers.For larger numbers, one of two consecutive numbers will always be even, and therefore, not a prime.

2 and 3 are the only consecutive numbers that are prime.

No other prime numbers are consecutive because there aren't any other even prime numbers.

There are two consecutive odd, whole numbers. The numbers are 39 and 41.

There are only two prime numbers that are consecutive numbers, 2 and 3. Their product is 2 x 3 = 6. The first prime numbers are 2, 3, 5, and 7 and the only two consecutive prime numbers whose product is a single digit are 2 and 3. (The next two consecutive prime numbers, 3 and 5, have a two-digit product.)

There aren't two consecutive whole numbers that fulfill that request.

1 and 2, whose product is 2.

96 cannot lie between two consecutive whole numbers.

20 is a whole number and so it cannot lie between two consecutive whole numbers.

The first two consecutive prime numbers that have a difference of 20 are the numbers 887 and 907.

If two whole numbers are consecutive, that means there can't be another whole number between them.

Yes, there are an infinite number of decimal points between any two consecutive whole numbers.

A pair of prime numbers are always relatively prime, whether they are consecutive or not. This is so because "relatively prime" means they have no common factors.

There are no four consecutive whole numbers that add up to 35. The sum of two consecutive [whole] numbers is an even number plus an odd number which is an odd number. The sum of two consecutive numbers and the two next consecutive numbers is the sum of two odd numbers which is even, but 35 is odd, so no four consecutive whole numbers cannot add up to 35.

It is called a whole consecutive number.

No two consecutive whole numbers equal 0.5625 using the basic operations of arithmetic.

31 is, itself, a whole number. One whole number cannot fall between two consecutive whole numbers.

136 cannot lie between two consecutive whole numbers.

Yes.Additional Information:If you have two consecutive numbers, one of them will be an odd number and the other will be an even number. Since even numbers are divisible by 2, the only even prime number is 2. If two consecutive numbers are prime, the even number must be 2. So, because 1 is not a prime number, the only time that two consecutive numbers can be prime is in the case of 2 and 3.

Small distinction. They are the only two consecutive numbers that are prime. 5 and 7, 7 and 11, 11 and 13 and so on are consecutive primes.

No because whole numbers that have only two factors are prime numbers

There is only one pair of consecutive prime numbers, and the prime numbers are two and three, because any pair of consecutive numbers has one odd and one even number, and two is the only even prime number, because all other even numbers can be divided by two, and the only pairs of consecutive numbers are one and two and three, but one is not prime because it only has one factor, thus making the only consecutive pair of primes two and three. But the problem asks for the product of the two numbers, not the numbers themselves, so just multiply two and three together to get a final result of six.

People also asked