You can win an award for more than the insurance limits. Now, try to collect the extra directly from the insured. Good luck.
Elevation can impact how active an earthquake fault is. Studies have shown that the higher in altitude a fault line is, the more active the fault line is.
A fault line!! Or a fijord- go to www.washingtoninthenorthwest.com and check it out!! or a fissure if your working on a crossword puzzle
The fault line of a earthquake is the crack in the Eath's crust ans where two or more tectonic plates butt together.
earth fault relay is similar like earth leakage ralay,but the 2nd one is more sensitiv.
Because LA is on a fault line. Toronto is not.
You need to be more specific about where the loss occurred. If it happened in a no-fault jurisdiction, your right to sue is typically more limited than in a tort jurisdiction.
I assume you are talking about life insurance. As the policy owner, you have no right to benefits so there is nothing for you to do. Benefits are only payable to the beneficiary unless all beneficiaries are deceased prior to the insured then it would be paid to the estate of the beneficiary. The owner of the policy basically has control of the policy before the insured dies. They are the only one who can change address, payment method, beneficiary, etc. If the owner is not the insured then the owner is the only person who can make policy changes. The insured person has no control over the policy if a different person is the owner but after death the owner has no more rights. Also, all life insurance is tax free as long as you never deducted the premiums for tax purposes.
Stupid people...
No, The at fault party (meaning the person who rear ended you) is responsible for your damages. Unless you could prove that your "State" was somehow responsible for yo being rear ended, You could not prove your state Liable for your damages.If you are carrying adequate coverage including uninsured and under insured motorists coverage then you will be covered for such a loss. Your insurer could pay your damages and then seek reimbursement through the courts from the at fault uninsured driver whom you allege was driving illegally.If you purchase only the minimum coverage and left uninsured, under insured motorists coverage off your policy then you accepted the risk that such a loss could happen.AnswerNo, of course not.If you were mugged, could you get reimbursed by the state since the mugger was committing a crime?That said, if you could collect restitution from the state, states would get a lot more serious about enforcing their insurance laws.
Two problems... First, if the accident was in any way your fault, then you are on the hook for that percentage of the cost of the accident. Since most accidents are never 100% one person's fault, this could cost you thousands or more. Even though the other driver most probably has un-insured/under-insured coverage, you can be assured that he/she will subrogate the claim, and their insurance company will come after you for payment. Second, many states require insurance as a requirement for driving a car. Failure to have insurance is a chargeable offense, and you could be fined and/or jailed because of this. At minimum, you can expect that your license will be suspended or revoked.
call the at fault company and advise you need to report a claim...give them all the info you have on their insured, they can set up a claim and proceed with the claim investigation..if you need more info/help please provide more details and I'll see what i can do.........
well yes, the person 'at fault' is generally always responsible, but not enough details in your question, there are many exclusions that could apply, more info/loss details and i will try and be of more assistance.
It sounds like there is more to the story than what is told here. If you lost your job through no fault of your own, the unemployment investigators would check out all the facts in the case. If you were innocent, you would most likely collect benefits. If, under New Mexico's laws you were in the wrong, you would not.
Life insurance proceeds are payable according to the beneficiary designation made by the insured and that is a part of the insurance policy. As such, the beneficiary can be any person or entity that had an insurable interest in the life of the insured at the time of the policy's inception. Concievably, that can be one or more of the siblings of the person insured. However, the insured is free to change the beneficiary(ies) at any time prior to death. If the insured designates his/her estate as the beneficiary of the policy, upon death, the proceeds are paid to the estate and distributed per the terms of the deceased's Will. If there is no Will, the proceeds, along with other assets of the estate, are distributed according to the laws of intestate successation of the state in which the insured died.
You can sue them if there is a chance of collecting anything, but it's hard to collect even if you prevail and they have money. First wait until fault is determined unless you are in a no fault state. Hopefully, the other insurance co will pay, if not hopefully, you had more than liability.
A person can lose everything he or she owns when creditors move in to collect what they are owed. A person might have to go through bankruptcy.
A person can lose everything he or she owns when creditors move in to collect what they are owed. A person might have to go through bankruptcy.