is that both grasslands and clearing forests for farming are both negative and effective to the environment because the forests are what pollutes the air for us to breath with oxygen and that gives us nitrogen that we both need
the negative is that people had to use their hands to bury anything and the positive was that they got payed for it.
In some areas that are naturally abundant with plant life and grow many varieties of flora, farming has taken place and has caused much of the land to be clear of its natural vegetation. In other less arid regions, farming has transformed desolate deserts and grasslands into lush, crop-yielding land.
It is neither. It is just a phrase coined by animal rights activists to refer to large-scale animal agriculture, though it certainly has very negative connotations.
I tell you. It is very simple. Air pollution. only STUPID people do not know the answer. Then come and ASK the question.
Two positive results for the Homestead Act are that you got 160 acres for free and that you could get money by farming on that land or by mining on the land.
biodiversity
biodiversity
biodiversity
a grasslands soil is good for farming because it has no guantity of big or small.it has rich soil
When clearing land for farming what was cleared and shipped to England?Read more: When_clearing_land_for_farming_what_was_cleared_and_shipped_to_England
it affects the environment because there might still be animals on the farm
The Grasslands soil is usually deep, dark, and rich. Because a lot of its soil is very rich, a lot of the grasslands have been destroyed and most of it disturbed, due to farming.
weed and farming
the negative is that people had to use their hands to bury anything and the positive was that they got payed for it.
Plains or Grasslands
Too hot or too cold . farming
The soil of grassland is good for farming because the soil is very rich.