Probably not. Nothing travels faster than the speed of light.
Because the people whose eyes could not detect visible light didn't surviveto have children. They were completely outclassed, outhunted, and outfoughtby the people whose eyes could detect it.
astrometry
They could detect sound waves
Usually with your nose, although you could also use a trained dog.
mars rover
The mass and velocity of an object do not determine its wavelength: it could be travelling in a straight line!
You cannot travel at the speed of light. Period.
4.8 x 10^-19
You have been travelling is correct. You would never say you have been on travelling, although for poetic emphasis you could say you have been travelling on.
That would depend on what way you were travelling and how fast you were travelling at. You could be crawling, hopping, walking, swimming, driving, flying, sailing, skiing, cycling etc. You could be doing any of those at different speeds. The terrain you were travelling over could be another factor, as could other things, like weather.That would depend on what way you were travelling and how fast you were travelling at. You could be crawling, hopping, walking, swimming, driving, flying, sailing, skiing, cycling etc. You could be doing any of those at different speeds. The terrain you were travelling over could be another factor, as could other things, like weather.That would depend on what way you were travelling and how fast you were travelling at. You could be crawling, hopping, walking, swimming, driving, flying, sailing, skiing, cycling etc. You could be doing any of those at different speeds. The terrain you were travelling over could be another factor, as could other things, like weather.That would depend on what way you were travelling and how fast you were travelling at. You could be crawling, hopping, walking, swimming, driving, flying, sailing, skiing, cycling etc. You could be doing any of those at different speeds. The terrain you were travelling over could be another factor, as could other things, like weather.That would depend on what way you were travelling and how fast you were travelling at. You could be crawling, hopping, walking, swimming, driving, flying, sailing, skiing, cycling etc. You could be doing any of those at different speeds. The terrain you were travelling over could be another factor, as could other things, like weather.That would depend on what way you were travelling and how fast you were travelling at. You could be crawling, hopping, walking, swimming, driving, flying, sailing, skiing, cycling etc. You could be doing any of those at different speeds. The terrain you were travelling over could be another factor, as could other things, like weather.That would depend on what way you were travelling and how fast you were travelling at. You could be crawling, hopping, walking, swimming, driving, flying, sailing, skiing, cycling etc. You could be doing any of those at different speeds. The terrain you were travelling over could be another factor, as could other things, like weather.That would depend on what way you were travelling and how fast you were travelling at. You could be crawling, hopping, walking, swimming, driving, flying, sailing, skiing, cycling etc. You could be doing any of those at different speeds. The terrain you were travelling over could be another factor, as could other things, like weather.That would depend on what way you were travelling and how fast you were travelling at. You could be crawling, hopping, walking, swimming, driving, flying, sailing, skiing, cycling etc. You could be doing any of those at different speeds. The terrain you were travelling over could be another factor, as could other things, like weather.That would depend on what way you were travelling and how fast you were travelling at. You could be crawling, hopping, walking, swimming, driving, flying, sailing, skiing, cycling etc. You could be doing any of those at different speeds. The terrain you were travelling over could be another factor, as could other things, like weather.That would depend on what way you were travelling and how fast you were travelling at. You could be crawling, hopping, walking, swimming, driving, flying, sailing, skiing, cycling etc. You could be doing any of those at different speeds. The terrain you were travelling over could be another factor, as could other things, like weather.
if they're in the way of an rough object travelling 50 miles per hour or more, yes, very dangerous, lethal one could say
To detect something would be to discover that it exists, or is present, without actually knowing of its existence or occurrenceTo look for is to try to find some specific target.I could take a metal detector among the beach to look for coins; whilst looking for the specific target, I could perhaps detect the existence of a different metal object under the sand
Yes, provided the object was hotter or colder than its surroundings, you'd be able to detect it. And, you could use an infra red 'flashlight' anyway.
That will depend on where you were coming from and how you were travelling. It could take seconds if you were just at its border. It could take months if you were travelling from Australia by boat.
Depending on what exactly the excess material is and what it got inside, there are a number of possibilities. It could have been from a faulty seal on a container, it may have already been inside the object in question and you have just noticed it, or you may have over calculated the quantity of a liquid you were using and it overflowed.
It could be excess insulin secretion from your pancreas, but high glucose foods may cause this, and the enzymes would help
Velocity means speed and direction. If one car was travelling 60mph northwards and one car was travelling 60mph southwards, they would both have the same speed but they would have different velocities. Acceleration means a change in velocity; this could be a change in speed or direction or both.