r ≠ (+/-)7, as that would cause division by 0
You are supposed to multiply the length by the edge that is a fraction and divide it by 2 and multiply by 3. Then you add 3.14. You should get your answer
What fraction is it supposed to be. If it is 135/100 than 1 and 35/100
Let's suppose the opposite and say that it is rational, so we can write it as a fraction of two natural numbers, where m 1:l/mLet's chose l and m in the way that the fraction l/m will be reduced, i.e, l and m have no common divider.So, according to the supposed, (l/m)2 = nFrom here, l2 = nm2Now we see that l should be dividible by m. But we've chosen l and m in such a way that it couldn't be. Contradiction.So we cannot represent the square of n as a rational fracture.
Depending on where the parentheses are supposed to go, it could be (-4p) or it could be (5p - 9) .
This could have been an intriguing little exercise if you hadn't left the fraction out of the question. (If the fraction was supposed to be 1/2 then the answer is "No change".)
The expression "suppose to" isn't correct. It should be "supposed to"
The "undefined" label appears anywhere on Poptropica when the program cannot find the name, label, or conversation that is supposed to go there. The term appeared on two islands on the Map that were already pre-released, and they were not new islands.
The Name Alyse is supposed to mean Rational it is Greek!!
IBM Rational is a service provided by IBM. IBM Rational helps with software and systems development. It is supposed to help software be more profitable and and improve productivity.
"x281" is an expression, not an inequality. An inequality is supposed to have an inequality sign, such as "<" or ">".
Surrealist artworks are not supposed to be explained in rational terms. They are riddles without an answer.
A face which lacks any expression - it's supposed to prevent opponents from guessing what cards you've got.
If that is supposed to be 8 and 3/8 it would be: 67/8
4 1 it is supposed to say 4 over 1 4/1
You are supposed to multiply the length by the edge that is a fraction and divide it by 2 and multiply by 3. Then you add 3.14. You should get your answer
Indifference curves are not supposed to have any thickness to them at all. It would not be rational if an indifference curve had thickness to it. It is supposed to look like a really thin pancake with only one side.
What fraction is it supposed to be. If it is 135/100 than 1 and 35/100