Best Answer

In scientific notation it is: 6.9*1012 m3

It could also be expressed as 6.9 trillion m3 or 6.9 quadrillion litres

Q: How can 6900 billion m3 be expressed otherwise?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Volume

A volume would be expressed in cubic meters (m3), not in meters.

By multiplying the number in m3 by 1000.

It is 2.2 MT/M3 and not 2.2 Kg/M3

M2 is square M3 is cubed.

Related questions

2

Volume

It is "cubic metres".

A volume would be expressed in cubic meters (m3), not in meters.

By multiplying it by the density of the substance (expressed in tonne/m3) that occupies the volume of 1000m3.

The density of matter is expressed in the form mass per unit of volume (mass per unit volume).

Density is measured in mass per volume, in SI units the density is commonly expressed in kg/m3.

China is a country that boasting of many lakes, over 2300 of which have areas over 1 km2, and the total area of all the lakes reaches 70988 km2, accounting for about 0.8% of the total area of the country, with a total storage capacity of 707.7 billion m3, of which fresh water storing capacity amounts to 225 billion m3. China is a country that boasting of many lakes, over 2300 of which have areas over 1 km2, and the total area of all the lakes reaches 70988 km2, accounting for about 0.8% of the total area of the country, with a total storage capacity of 707.7 billion m3, of which fresh water storing capacity amounts to 225 billion m3.

There are 1000m in a km. Thus if we cube both numbers we get 1,000,000,000m3 in a km3. Therefore, to convert from km3 to m3 you have to multiply the number you have by 1,000,000,000.

Gravity is not measured in Newtons. The Gravitational Constant, as its name implies, was the same a billion years ago as it is today, which is: 6.67 × 10-11 m3 kg-1 s-2

I think we can safely say no. If we consider the M3 money supply in the United States for the year 2007 then we're talking around 11.5 trillion dollars then even if we were to assume that all the other countries in the world were as rich as the United States then we still would not get to 1 billion billion dollars. For easy figuring let's round the number of countries up to 200 then we have the following for comparison; M3 for 2007 - (all the money in the US for 2007) $11,500,000,000,000 - 11.5 trillion dollars times 200 countries (number of countries rounded up) $2,300,000,000,000,000 - 2.3 quadrillion dollars one billion billion $1,000,000,000,000,000,000 - 1.0 quintillion dollars References: For the number of countries in the world, http://geography.about.com/cs/countries/a/numbercountries.htm M3 Money supply in the US for 2007 http://www.nowandfutures.com/key_stats.html Number Notation http://www.math.com/tables/general/numnotation.htm

imagin this 10mm X 10mm X 10mm will give you a cm3 then 100cm X 100 cm X 100 cm will give you a m3 There are 1M cm3 in a m3 and add the zeros form mm (3) so 1,000,000 plus 000 = 1,000,000,000mm3 1m3 = 1,000,000,000 mm3