It's not that it's not correct, it was that the experiment proved it wrong.
And it is helpful because it tells the scientist that their idea was incorrect do to speak and that the experiment proved it.
You can still write a very good report if the hypothesis was proven wrong
i dont have friends
i dont have friends
i dont have friends
in sequence a hypothesis is useful only in
So they know not to make the same mistake again
It must be testable.
capable of being proven false. testable
An experiment is performed to generate more data. If the data proves to not support the hypothesis the experiment was still useful. You could reproduce your experiment to see if it is performing the way it should. After you have confirmed the experiment is performing correctly you then could devise another experiment to further test your hypothesis or accept the result and revise your hypothesis.
Hypotheses are based on theories. If a hypothesis seems incorrect then a scientist knows that she has been mistaken about her understanding of the theory, and that's why she formed the wrong hypothesis to test. Or it might be that she has learned that there are new conditions under which the theory does not hold, and that the theory must be refined. Both of these are useful to scientists.
So they know not to make the same mistake again
Hypotheses are useful because they can be tested, and scientists love to test to prove if whether your theory is right or wrong.
in sequence a hypothesis is useful only in
to be useful in sciences a hypothesis must be
Hypotheses are useful because they can be tested, and scientists love to test to prove if whether your theory is right or wrong.
a hypothesis is only useful if u have something to test it on. : ) <3
If you do not know the answer to something, you can start by making a hypothesis.
So they know not to make the same mistake again
tested.
It is only useful if you can test it.
for scientists