Purpleheeler
If they already know what they are why do you need to explain to them?
Wiki User
∙ 2010-05-25 13:44:51the first people to make changes in the integers are RAMANUJAM.
Most people refer to the positive integers as the natural numbers. That would exclude the negative integers and zero.
Traditionally, the set of integers that represents the natural numbers is {1,2,3,...}, which are the positive integers. Some people include the non-negative integers as the set of natural numbers, which is {0,1,2,3,...}, and includes 0.
Some people say it came from China.
Until someone first broke an item into separate parts all numbers were integers - people counted things... animals, people, days, all things were whole numbers.
No.But some people believe that they are.
To explain how you have saved someone from getting hurt in one paragraph, you could begin with a topic sentence that introduces how your job or actions protect other people. Then, using detail sentences, explain exactly how you kept that person from injuring himself or herself.
Unfortunately, the term "whole numbers" is somewhat ambiguous - it means different things to different people. If you mean "integers", yes, it is closed. If you mean "positive integers" or "non-negative integers", no, it isn't.
Explain the motives that makes some people jacobites?
If we could be certain the questions refer to integers, they can be. The answer is always 1. Since this browser can't reproduce fractions, most people will refer to a set of denominators as if they were integers.
One misconception is that the process is difficult.
Scientists use exponents to determine the speed of light, the distance between planets, or counting cells. Counting the number of cells can determine if someone does not have enough white blood cells, so they cannot fight diseases as easily. I know that people have million of cells in their body, so with exponents you do not have to write them all out, but in powers of ten.