It depends on your speed.
You didn't tell us how long it took to walk those 3.33 meters, so it is impossible to know how long 100 meters would take.
You would walk one metre in 3.8/6 = 19/30 seconds. Therefore, 100 metres would take 19/30 x 100 = 63.3 recurring (that is, 63.333...) seconds.
assuming walking speed = 100 meter/minute 1200 meters take 1200/100 = 12 minutes
If you walked 10 metres in 3 seconds, it would take 30 seconds to walk 1oo metres.
(Six hundred divided by one hundred) seconds
You didn't tell us how long it took to walk those 3.33 meters, so it is impossible to know how long 100 meters would take.
It will take him 104.6 seconds.
10 seconds
You would walk one metre in 3.8/6 = 19/30 seconds. Therefore, 100 metres would take 19/30 x 100 = 63.3 recurring (that is, 63.333...) seconds.
assuming walking speed = 100 meter/minute 1200 meters take 1200/100 = 12 minutes
As time equals distance divided by speed you get; t=1500/10 (100/10 so you are in m/s) Therefore it would take 150 seconds
If you walked 10 metres in 3 seconds, it would take 30 seconds to walk 1oo metres.
1000.3848995m/s
(Six hundred divided by one hundred) seconds
If the light is in a vacuum then it would take around 0.00000033 seconds.
9.8 seconds.
lol how much can u count without stoping,,,for each number its 100 meters,,,,,dats how long its going to take