answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

"APR" means "Annual Percentage Rate". When money is borrowed and not paid back

immediately, that's the piece that gets added on to it each year, as the price for the

convenience of not paying it back yet.

If you're the borrower and you have someone else'smoney, then you want the

lowest possible APR. That's on a credit card, a car loan, a home mortgage, etc.

If you're the lender and somebody else has yourmoney, then you want the highest

possible APR. That's on a bank savings account, an investment, a CD, etc.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How would you determine if 8 percent APR is better or worse than 5.24 percent APR?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

If you didnt follow the mathematic instructions would your food be better or worse?

This is a yes and no question. If you are baking. exact measurements are extremely important. If you are deciding how much cinnamon to add, your personal taste will determine if it is better or worse.


What would be the best interpretation of a student whose score was in the 87th percentile?

It means 87 percent of students performed worse or below the score of that student and 13 percent did better than that student.


Would your lives be better or worse without fungi?

better?


Would the world better or worse if Adolf Hitler hadn't lived?

It would be better.


Would the world be better or worse if beyoncé hadnt lived?

The world would be worse because we would not have good music to listen to


Is 2020 better or worse?

Better because Their Would Be More High Tech Things.


Would the alternatives be better or worse for the local environment?

nathing


What percent of the US will miss Harry Potter?

That would be impossible to determine.


Would it be better or worse if Sojourner Truth had not lived?

there is still slavery


Would the world be better or worse if Jackie Robinson had not been born?

no


If all companies had an objective of maximizing shareholder wealth would people overall tend to be better or worse off?

If all companies had an objective of maximizing shareholder wealth would people overall tend to be better or worse off?


Would the world be better or worse if lemony snicket hadn't lived?

The world, in my opinion would be a lot worse because some people love his books.