Yes.
It is irrational.
please rephrase or grammar-check your question.
No. If we let x be irrational, then 0/x = 0 is a counterexample. However, if we consider nonzero rational numbers, then our conjecture is true. We shall prove this by contradiction. Suppose we have nonzero rational numbers x and y, and an irrational number z, such that x/z = y. Since z is not equal to 0, x = yz. Since y is not equal to 0, x/y = z. Since x/y is a quotient of rational numbers, x/y is rational. Therefore, z is rational, contradicting our assumption that z was irrational. QED.
No. Here is a counter-example: x = 1 + sqrt(2) y = 2 - sqrt(2) x and y are irrational. x + y = 3 is rational.
Imaginary numbers are not intrinsically rational or irrational.Of course, all real numbers are either rational or irrational numbers.Imaginary numbers are not real numbers.Imaginary numbers have a real part and an imaginary part, sometimes written like z=x+i y.The two parts, i.e. the x and the y, are real numbers. As real numbers, they are either rational or irrational. Its just that the two parts of a complex number may both be either rational or irrational or one may be rational and the other irrational. One could always make up a new name for these cases, but right now there is no such classification.
It is irrational.
Suppose x is a rational number and y is an irrational number.Let x + y = z, and assume that z is a rational number.The set of rational number is a group.This implies that since x is rational, -x is rational [invertibility].Then, since z and -x are rational, z - x must be rational [closure].But z - x = y which implies that y is rational.That contradicts the fact that y is an irrational number. The contradiction implies that the assumption [that z is rational] is incorrect.Thus, the sum of a rational number x and an irrational number y cannot be rational.
an irrational number PROOF : Let x be any rational number and y be any irrational number. let us assume that their sum is rational which is ( z ) x + y = z if x is a rational number then ( -x ) will also be a rational number. Therefore, x + y + (-x) = a rational number this implies that y is also rational BUT HERE IS THE CONTRADICTION as we assumed y an irrational number. Hence, our assumption is wrong. This states that x + y is not rational. HENCE PROVEDit will always be irrational.
please rephrase or grammar-check your question.
No. If we let x be irrational, then 0/x = 0 is a counterexample. However, if we consider nonzero rational numbers, then our conjecture is true. We shall prove this by contradiction. Suppose we have nonzero rational numbers x and y, and an irrational number z, such that x/z = y. Since z is not equal to 0, x = yz. Since y is not equal to 0, x/y = z. Since x/y is a quotient of rational numbers, x/y is rational. Therefore, z is rational, contradicting our assumption that z was irrational. QED.
If both numbers are rational then x plus y is a rational number
No. The product of conjugate pairs is always rational.So suppose sqrt(y) is the irrational square root of the rational number y. ThenThus [x + sqrt(y)]*[x - sqrt(y)] = x^2 + x*sqrt(y) - x*sqrt(y) - sqrt(y)*sqrt(y)= x^2 + y^2 which is rational.
Let x be a rational number and y be an irrational number.Suppose their sum = z, is rational.That is x + y = zThen y = z - xThe set of rational number is closed under addition (and subtraction). Therefore, z - x is rational.Thus you have left hand side (irrational) = right hand side (rational) which is a contradiction.Therefore, by reducio ad absurdum, the supposition that z is rational is false, ie the sum of a rational and an irrational must be irrational.
Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
No. Here is a counter-example: x = 1 + sqrt(2) y = 2 - sqrt(2) x and y are irrational. x + y = 3 is rational.
Rational numbers can be represented in the form x/y but irrational numbers cannot.
Unless you multiply 0 with some irrational number, it is impossible. Here's why: Let x,y be rational with x = a/b, z = c/d and y be the irrational number. If we presume xy = z then we have y = z/x. However, this is equal to (c/d)/(a/b) = (bc)/(ad), which is rational. Since y is assumed to be irrational, this cannot occur (unless one of b,c is zero).