If the air is still, then the ball would move in a straight line, and come to a slow eventual stop due to friction with that air. If the air is moving, then the ball will slow down and eventually be moving around with the air, the amount of which would depend on the mass of the ball and the friction it has with the air. If it's in a perfect vacuum, then it will simply keep moving in a straight line at the speed that it was released at.
It would travel in a straight line until air resistance brought it to a standstill. It would then hover at that point - in mid-air forever.
If air resistance is also removed from the scenario an even stranger thing will happen. The ball will continue in a straight line forever. But, because of the curvature of the earth, the earth's surface will drop away so that the ball will actually fly off into space.
One problem with this thought experiment is that the concept of a "straight" line depends on gravity.
in vacuum the ball would continue at the velocity thrown forever.
in an atmosphere the ball would gradually slow under resistance until stationary relative to the atmosphere.
The ball would never fall to earth
The ball would follow a straight line.
It would go up
If you electrophoresed DNA vertically, you would have to account for gravity.
This is due to Newtons first law. Because their is no gravity the object will move in a straight line unless a outside force is applied to it. Such as the gravity of a near by planet/object.
yes it does cause if there was no gravity then ur parachute would be going up
On the bullet itself, gravity and air friction.
Gravitational acceleration is a constant value for a celestial body, and doesn't depend on air resistance/friction. The value on Earth is constant anywhere on Earth, just like the value on Mars is constant anywhere on Mars. In practical,however, this is different. Air resistance lowers the value of gravitational acceleration.
travel horizontally
It doesn't matter whether the object is thrown down, up, horizontally, or diagonally. Once it leaves the thrower's hand, it is accelerated downward by an amount equal to acceleration of gravity on the planet where this is all happening. On Earth, if you throw an object horizontally, it accelerates downward at the rate of 9.8 meters per second2 ... just as it would if you simply dropped it. Whether it's dropped or thrown horizontally, it hits the ground at the same time.
It depends on the surface on which the object is moving, and also any other forces - such as gravity.
The ball would continue straight without any gravitational forces acting on it, and without air resistance. If you consider air resistance, then the spin of the ball may give it a curved path, and eventually the ball would stop traveling as the air resistance slows down the ball.
If gravity wasn't here we would be thrown off the planet. Also the nanosecond you lifted up your foot even a millimeter you would keep going forever until you hit something. You cant run without gravity.
If you electrophoresed DNA vertically, you would have to account for gravity.
No, Earth's gravity would not affect Pluto. However, the suns gravity does.
Does mars' gravity affect other objects. yes it does but the gravity is 38% of the earths gravity and if doesn't affect objects then it will have no moon.
It would just fall to the floor due to gravity.
It would travel in a straight line until air resistance brought it to a standstill. It would then hover at that point - in mid-air forever. If air resistance is also removed from the scenario an even stranger thing will happen. The ball will continue in a straight line forever. But, because of the curvature of the earth, the earth's surface will drop away so that the ball will actually fly off into space. One problem with this thought experiment is that the concept of a "straight" line depends on gravity.
because of 0 gravity
If the Earth didn't have gravity, we would be floating in the air and nothing would be in its place.