0
Given set of rules.
Anonymous
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In deductive reasoning you start from a set of rules and conditions to determine what must be true.?
given - apex :)
True or false In deductive thinking you start with a given set of rules and conditions and determine what must be true as a consequenceAsk us anything?
It is True!
Why null set is not considered as an element of any set even though it is an subset of every set?
Let set A = { 1, 2, 3 } Set A has 3 elements. The subsets of A are {null}, {1}, {2}, {3}, {1,2},{1,3},{1,2,3} This is true that the null set {} is a subset. But how many elements are in the null set? 0 elements. this is why the null set is not an element of any set, but a subset of any set. ====================================== Using the above example, the null set is not an element of the set {1,2,3}, true. {1} is a subset of the set {1,2,3} but it's not an element of the set {1,2,3}, either. Look at the distinction: 1 is an element of the set {1,2,3} but {1} (the set containing the number 1) is not an element of {1,2,3}. If we are just talking about sets of numbers, then another set will never be an element of the set. Numbers will be elements of the set. Other sets will not be elements of the set. Once we start talking about more abstract sets, like sets of sets, then a set can be an element of a set. Take for example the set consisting of the two sets {null} and {1,2}. The null set is an element of this set.
Is the null set an element of every set?
No, but it is a subset of every set.It is an element of the power set of every set.
Why a null set is subst of every set?
The definition of subset is ; Set A is a subset of set B if every member of A is a member of B. The null set is a subset of every set because every member of the null set is a member of every set. This is true because there are no members of the null set, so anything you say about them is vacuously true.
What reasoning you using when you start from a given set of rules and conditions and determine?
Deductive reasoning
When you start from a given set of rules and conditions and determine what must be true you are using what type of reasoning?
This is called deductive reasoning.
When you start from a given set of rules and conditions to determine what must be true what form of reasoning are you using?
deductive reasoning
When you start from a given set of rules and conditions to determine what must be true what form of reasoning are you using reasoning?
deductive reasoning
When you start from a given set of rules and conditions and conditions and determine what must be true you are using reasoning?
This is called deductive reasoning.
In deductive reasoning you start from a set of rules and conditions to determine what must be true.?
given - apex :)
When you start from the given set of rules and conditions and determine what must be true you are using what reasoning?
Deductive
When you start from a given set rules conditions and determine what must be true you are using reasoning?
deductive
What is the difference between deductive and subjective reasoning?
the difference between deductive and subjective reasoning is that deductive reasoning is a logical process in which a conclusion drawn from a set of premises contains no more information than the premises taken collectively. While subjective reasoning is drawn from past experience.
When you start from a given set of rules and conditions and determine what must be true what are you using?
You are using deductive logic.
What are you using when you start from a given set of rules and conditions and determine what must be true?
You are using deductive logic.
What is deductive reasonings?
Deductive reasoning is when you base a conjecture on statements that are assumed to be true.general to specific
