Neither are.
1. With regard to whether they admit an object or not: 1. Transitive 2. Intransitive 2. With regard to its relationship with the complement and object-types: 1. Intensive 2. Extensive 3. With regard to whether they can be progressive or not: 1. Stative 2. Dynamic
Most people love their Dyson, but 2% of the ones in production have issues and are claimed under warranty.
of course not neither. It is a multiple of 2 so it is composite.
There is 2 different roles. an umpire and a referee. The difference is that a referee has the final say on all technical issues and is responsible for everything.
God is an unknowable essence that does not "live" in some location. Neither 2 Chronicles 6 nor 1 Kings 8 answer this question. Both passages regard placement of the Ark of the Covenant (containing the Ten Commandments) and not the location of God.
0 is neither prime nor composite. A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1, 2, and 0. 1, 2, and 0 have a different name.
No, it is not and they are not.
No, neither.
neither
Neither...When you say 'x > 2', you are saying that x is any number greater than 2. It is more of a statement rather than a sum.
no number but 1 and 0 are neither. multiple of 2 so composite
It is prime.