A society that cannot compute fractions and has no concept of "zero" is at an instant disadvantage compared to one that can and does.
No. Counting numbers are whole numbers.
No. Negative numbers are not counting numbers.
Whole numbers include the number 0 and counting numbers do not.
They are not. 0 (which is a whole number) is not considered a counting number(natural #).
No, it is not. Counting numbers are positive whole numbers.
A counting number is the numbers you lear as a little kid, counting numbers are one and up. Integers include the counting numbers, 0, and the opposite (negative) of counting numbers. So yes, a counting number or the opposite of a counting number is an integer.
A counting number is the numbers you lear as a little kid, counting numbers are one and up. Integers include the counting numbers, 0, and the opposite (negative) of counting numbers. So yes, a counting number or the opposite of a counting number is an integer.
No. Counting numbers are whole numbers.
The counting numbers are the whole numbers that start at 1 and end at infinity. Although zero is considered a whole number, it is not a counting number.
Yes, counting numbers are a proper subset of whole numbers.
No. Negative numbers are not counting numbers.
Whole numbers include the number 0 and counting numbers do not.
They are not. 0 (which is a whole number) is not considered a counting number(natural #).
No, it is not. Counting numbers are positive whole numbers.
They are also counting numbers.
It is a definitional thing. Counting numbers are whole numbers (integers) starting with 1.
Apart from poor spelling, this question is based on a fallacy. Counting numbers and whole numbers are NOT the same. For example, -3 is a whole number but it is not a counting number.