Yes. All terminating decimals are.
109 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 109/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
109*1 = 109 and 109*10 = 1090 are two.
No, it is rational.
It is rational. It is rational. It is rational. It is rational.
"Rational" is an adjective and so there cannot be "a rational" (and certainly not "an rational"). Any answer would depend on whether the question was about a rational number, a rational person, a rational argument or "a rational" combined with some other noun.
It is a rational number
109 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 109/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
109, like any integer, can be written as a fraction in simplest form by putting it over 1.
It is a rational, composite even number and can be expressed as 9.2*109 in scientific notation
218 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 218/1.
109 and 1 is the only factor pair for 109.
109*1 = 109 and 109*10 = 1090 are two.
Rational
1.14 is rational.
Prime factorization of 109 = 1 * 109
4.6 is rational.
109