No it is not. It can be written as a fraction, so it cannot be irrational.
No because it is a ratio of two integers (that's what "rational" means) 166/100
No, the square root of 166 is not a rational number. A rational number can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, but the square root of 166 is an irrational number because it cannot be simplified to such a form. Its decimal representation is non-repeating and non-terminating, approximately equal to 12.845.
An irrational number.
When added to a rational number, any irrational number will produce an irrational number.also, when added to an irrational number, any rational number will produce an irrational number.
It is not an irrational number!
No because it is a ratio of two integers (that's what "rational" means) 166/100
If the 6's continue, it is -5/3, and therefore it is rational. If they do not continue, it is -166/100, and still rational.
An irrational number.
The sum of a rational and irrational number must be an irrational number.
No. The sum of an irrational number and any other [real] number is irrational.
rational * irrational = irrational.
No, 3.56 is not an irrational number. 3.56 is rational.
-Pi is irrational, because it does not terminate or repeat. Whenever you multiply an irrational number by a rational number (-1), the result is an irrational number.
A negative irrational number can be thought of as an irrational number multiplied by -1, or an irrational number with a minus sign in front of it.
At least one of the factors has to be irrational.* An irrational number times ANY number (except zero) is irrational. * The product of two irrational numbers can be either rational or irrational.
Any irrational number, added to 0.4 will give an irrational number.
Any irrational number, when multiplied by 0.5 will give an irrational number.