No, they are both composite.
61, 67, are prime numbers - 63 is not - 63 is a composite number.
Only 63. 0 and 1 are not composite numbers and are not prime numbers (even though 1 used to be). 19 is a prime number.
13 prime 63 composite 61 prime 31 prime Well the question should have been either, Which one of these numbers is not a composite number? Or, Which one of these numbers is not a prime number?
63 is composite.
63 is a composite number
No. 63 is a composite number with two unique prime factors. 63 = 3 * 3 * 7
31 and 47 are prime, the rest composite.
No because they are all composite numbers
63 is a composite number. A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite. (63 has more that two factors: 1, 3, 7, 9, 21, and 63)
A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite. 63 is composite.
13 is a prime number, 63 is a composite number. A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite.