Best Answer

no the equation is not correct, the only way it would be correct is if x=7 which would be a commutative property

Q: Is 7 divided by x equals x divided by 7 a commutative property associative property distributive property or none of these the equation is incorrect?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

No, the equation m + n = n + m does not represent the distributive property. The distributive property is typically written as a(b + c) = ab + ac, where a, b, and c are numbers. It describes the relationship between multiplication and addition. The equation m + n = n + m is known as the commutative property of addition, which states that the order of addition does not affect the sum.

When applying distributive property to solve an equation, you multiply each term by term. For instance: a(b + c) = ab + ac

The associative property means that in a sum (for example), (1 + 2) + 3 = 1 + (2 + 3). In other words, you can add on the left first, or on the right first, and get the same result. Similar for multiplication. How you use this in an equation depends on the equation.

Associative? Commutativity?

The associative property in algebra is important for organization of numbers. Rearranging the numbers and parenthesis will not change values but instead make the equation more convenient.

Related questions

3 + 4x = 4x + 3 is an example of the commutative property of addition.

distributive is just a longer way to show the equation and commutative is the numbers combined. Example: 4(5+x) is the distibutive and the equal equation that is commutative is 20+4x

che! leche yung gumawa nitong Answers

Explain how you can use the commutative and associative prpoperties to add 19+28+81 mentally.

multiply the entire equation by a numberdivide the entire equation by a numberadd numbers to both sides of the equationsubtract numbers from both sides of the equationuse the commutative property to rearrange the equationuse the associative property to rearrange the equationfactor a number out of a portion of the equation

Associative

An axiom in algebra is the stepping stone to solving equations. In order to solve and equation you know how to use the commutative, associative, distributive, transitive and equalilty axiom to solve the basic steps. For example: if you want an equation in the form y = mx + b, given 6x - 3y = 9 you must subtract 6x from both sides giving: -3y = 9-6x. Then you divide by -3 to get y = -3 + 2x. But the equation is not in the from y = mx + b. So we use the commutative property to switch the -3 + 2x and make it 2x - 3. Now it become y = 2x -3. and it is in the form y = mx + b. This manipulation could not be perfromed unless tahe student knew the commutative property. Once the axiom is know the algebraic manipulations fall into place.

No, the equation m + n = n + m does not represent the distributive property. The distributive property is typically written as a(b + c) = ab + ac, where a, b, and c are numbers. It describes the relationship between multiplication and addition. The equation m + n = n + m is known as the commutative property of addition, which states that the order of addition does not affect the sum.

When applying distributive property to solve an equation, you multiply each term by term. For instance: a(b + c) = ab + ac

The Commutative Property is illustrated by this equation: a * b = b * a.

The associative property means that in a sum (for example), (1 + 2) + 3 = 1 + (2 + 3). In other words, you can add on the left first, or on the right first, and get the same result. Similar for multiplication. How you use this in an equation depends on the equation.

With a huge amount of difficulty because, as an identity, the equation is false. For example, let d = 1 and v = 1. The equation would then imply that 2 + 4 - 3 = 5 - 1 or 3 = 4 which is patently false.