Yes because -82 is a whole number
Yes.
no
82 is an integer and so is already rounded to more than just the tenths place. So the answer is 82.82 is an integer and so is already rounded to more than just the tenths place. So the answer is 82.82 is an integer and so is already rounded to more than just the tenths place. So the answer is 82.82 is an integer and so is already rounded to more than just the tenths place. So the answer is 82.
The difference between them is 82
To the nearest integer, 82 To the nearest ten, 80
82 is an integer and not a fraction. It therefore makes little, if any, sense to write it as a mixed number. However, if you must, it can be expressed in rational form as 82/1.
164 is divisible by 1, 2, 4, 41, 82, and 164.
82 is not the square of an integer. The closest square number of an integer is 81, which is equal to 9 squared.
82 is an integer and so is already rounded to more than just the tenths place. So the answer is 82.82 is an integer and so is already rounded to more than just the tenths place. So the answer is 82.82 is an integer and so is already rounded to more than just the tenths place. So the answer is 82.82 is an integer and so is already rounded to more than just the tenths place. So the answer is 82.
The answer is -1. A negative integer is an integer to the left of zero on the number line. It is less than zero. So the greatest negative integer is -1.
The only common positive integer factor of 82 and 105 is 1.
The difference between them is 82
To the nearest integer, 82 To the nearest ten, 80
The only common positive integer factor of the numbers 69 and 82 is 1.
Actually, as a non-integer square root of a number, 82 is an irrational number. It has no end.
As an integer, it is already rounded to the nearest tenth.
1.2073
No.No; an integer must be a whole number that is positive or negative.For example, -204, 16, -82, and 79 are all integers.An integer is just a whole number, anything that is not a decimal or a fraction
82 is an integer and not a fraction. It therefore makes little, if any, sense to write it as a mixed number. However, if you must, it can be expressed in rational form as 82/1.