Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
4+9>5 5+9>4 4+5 is not greater than 9 No, since it doesn't comply with the Triangle Inequality Theorem (the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side)
2.7 IR x 0.0233263 USD/1 IR = 0.063 USD
Sir I am Imran khan in nepal my problem is 6000KVA Step down Transformer is not charging. Transformer Pri- 33000V /105A Sec- 6900V / 502Atransformer all test (open & short circuit ) good . but problem is HT(IR)= value this time IR value 50M ohmBefore 3days HT(IR) = value is 7000M ohm suddenly start Transformer result is Transformer not charging & HT(IR) value is down 50M ohm.
V=ir
It is a prime number.
No. Because during charging process of a battery current flows in opposite direction to the discharging/consumption. so equation Emf=P.d. +Ir is changed to Emf=p.d. +Ir. Hence during charging process of a battery Potential difference is greater than electromotive force.
Suppose y was such a number. Then if x = y, then x-4 is less than x ir x-4<y so y does not satisfy the requirements. This applies to any y, so the only solution is minus infinity.
No. This would imply that the speed of light in that medium was greater than the speed of light in a vacuum, which is physically impossible according to the theory of relativity. The relative index of refraction can be negative... that is, the speed in the medium may be faster than the speed in the surrounding environment... but the absolute IR cannot be negative.
Players placed on IR are still paid by the team. Most players have a down amount that is less than their full salary and that is what they are paid while on IR.
4+9>5 5+9>4 4+5 is not greater than 9 No, since it doesn't comply with the Triangle Inequality Theorem (the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle is greater than the length of the third side)
IR waves are longer than UV waves.
Depending on what sink you are comparing a kohler sink to ir could be more or less durable than others ,but I find that it's often more durable than others.
I have always prefered IR to XR, because I believe that IR works alot longer than 3-5 hours or whatever. And XR can build you up at the beginning and make you feel as though it's worn off which leads people to take more and that's always a problem. IR I believe kicks in and doesn't wear off for 8+ hours and doesn't really make you feel bad 2 hours after taking it. Not so much it's better, it depends on what you need to accomplish. A IR is best for doing alot within 4 hours, while XR's last around 8-10hours but felt less than it's IR counterpart.
"IR thermometres are quick and easy to use for babies. They are very accurate when used correctly, and can be easier to use than the traditional methods. On the other hand, IR thermometres are often much more expensive than traditional types as well."
Ultraviolet waves have shorter wavelengths than Infrared waves. Since the relationship between wavelength and frequency is inversely proportional, UV waves have a much higher frequency than IR waves. IR waves have a frequency around 1012 Hertz, while UV waves' frequencies are around 1018 Hz. Thus, UV waves are more powerful than IR waves and can cause binds between molecules to break much more easily than IR waves.
No. You will damage ir more than it already is.
UV ray is more intense. IR rays are less.