No. It would imply motion at infinite speed.
Djdlxhdpcmc
It is not possible since it would imply that the object moved some distance in no time. This would imply infinite speed which is not possible.
a vertical one
Yes it is.
The vertical distance of a heavy projectile. Heavy so that air resistance can be ignored.
If it is distance from a point versus time, with distance on the vertical axis and time on the horizontal axis, it would show a steep vertical climb on the graph. The steeper vertical change, the faster, but never completely vertical. Large "rise" (distance) over short "run" (time). With 0 acceleration, the graph is a straight line.
No: not until instantaneous teleportation is discovered.
Distance and Time are variables and always moving. Therefore the answer is no. Let's suppose: If time is the vertical axis and distance (travelled) the horizontal axis. Standing still (not travelling) would show a vertical graph line. If distance is the vertical axis and time the horizontal axis. Then standing still would form a horizontal line based on time alone.
distance-time graph
BecAuse that would mean it is going an infinite speed. The slope of a distance time graph is the objects velocity or speed. If there is a line parallel to the distance axis, there is a vertical line. The slope of a vertical line is infinite. It is not possible to go an infinite speed.
Speed-Versus-Time, Distance-Versus-Time.
Typically distance is plotted on the y-axis of a distance-time graph.
The main difference is that the vertical scale for a frequency graph is in units (or numbers) whereas in a percentage graph, it is in percentages,