No it's not true.
The vast majority of scientific reports use the S.I. metric system of measurement.
The scientist or student scientist should review the results. Conclusions should be drawn based on the results. Then, the hypothesis is reviewed to make sure the results confirm the hypothesis; if not, revise the hypothesis and rerun the experiment.
Quantitative means measured objectively, the measurement results in numbers.
computer
graphs
Calculus
false
Results will vary. Precision is compromised.
If the studied habitat is disturbed, it could have an effect on the results which would make them unreliable.
Research did not yield any results to your question.
The reason research article should fellow a standard format is that the scientists communicate with each other's through the articles and share their research results. To communicate effectively, the scientist need to fellow a standard format to present their research results in a clear and logical way
The first scientist may have made a mistake, or tailored the experiment to fit either a hypothesis or favorable results. The second scientist's results help to reinforce ar refute the first scientist's results.
Because a research study is necessary to be repeated, checked, confirmed.
commmunicating
They first research on the course of the problem and immediately they come up with a good results, they are able to resolve their problems.
Research results are published in scientific journals. If some scientist wishes to replicate the work of another scientist, he or she reads about it in the published report, and then does what the written description says.
Scientist use the metric system, since it is a universal standard. It makes it easier to compare results worldwide.
No. but research leads to results (both positive and negative).The data provided by research is sometimes referred to as either research or results of research.