Best Answer

If the distribution is parametric then yes.

User Avatar

Wiki User

โˆ™ 2013-07-24 21:26:21
This answer is:
User Avatar
Study guides


20 cards

A polynomial of degree zero is a constant term

The grouping method of factoring can still be used when only some of the terms share a common factor A True B False

The sum or difference of p and q is the of the x-term in the trinomial

A number a power of a variable or a product of the two is a monomial while a polynomial is the of monomials

See all cards

J's study guide

1 card

What is the name of Steve on minecraft's name

See all cards

Steel Tip Darts Out Chart

96 cards





See all cards

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is parametric test stronger than nonparametric test?
Write your answer...
Related questions

What is the difference between parametric and non parametric?

Nonparametric tests are sometimes called distribution free statistics because they do not require that the data fit a normal distribution. Nonparametric tests require less restrictive assumptions about the data than parametric restrictions. We can perform the analysis of categorical and rank data using nonparametric tests.

Distingnish between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Why the parametric statistics are considered more powerful than the nonparametric statistics. Explain.?

Parametric statistical tests assume that the data belong to some type of probability distribution. The normal distribution is probably the most common. That is, when graphed, the data follow a "bell shaped curve".On the other hand, non-parametric statistical tests are often called distribution free tests since don't make any assumptions about the distribution of data. They are often used in place of parametric tests when one feels that the assumptions of the have been violated such as skewed data.For each parametric statistical test, there is one or more nonparametric tests. A one sample t-test allows us to test whether a sample mean (from a normally distributed interval variable) significantly differs from a hypothesized value. The nonparametric analog uses the One sample sign test In one sample sign test,we can compare the sample values to the a hypothesized median (not a mean). In other words we are testing a population median against a hypothesized value k. We set up the hypothesis so that + and - signs are the values of random variables having equal size. A data value is given a plus if it is greater than the hypothesized mean, a negative if it is less, and a zero if it is equal.he sign test for a population median can be left tailed, right tailed, or two tailed. The null and alternative hypothesis for each type of test will be one of the following:Left tailed test: H0: median &ge; k and H1: median < kRight tailed test: H0: median &le; k and H1: median > kTwo tailed test: H0: median &ne; k and H1: median = kTo use the sign test, first compare each entry in the sample to the hypothesized median k.If the entry is below the median, assign it a - sign.If the entry is above the median, assign it a + sign.If the entry is equal to the median, assign it a 0.Then compare the number of + and - signs. The 0&prime;s are ignored.If there is a large difference in the number of + and - signs, then it is likely that the median is different from the hypothesized value and the null hypothesis should be rejected.When using the sign test, the sample size n is the total number of + and - signs.If the sample size > 25, we use the standard normal distribution to find the critical values and we find the test statistic by plugging n and x into a formula that can be found on the link.When n &le; 25, we find the test statistic x, by using the smaller number of + or - .So if we had 10 +'s and 5 -'s, the test statistic x would be 5. The zeros are ignored.I will provided a link to some nonparametric test that goes into more detail. The information about the Sign Test was just given as an example of one of the simplest nonparametric test so one can see how these tests work The Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, The Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis Test are a few more common nonparametric tests. Most statistics books will give you a list of the pros and cons of parametric vs noparametric tests.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of nonparametric statistics compared to the parametric statistics?

Non-Parametric statistics are statistics where it is not assumed that the population fits any parametrized distributions. Non-Parametric statistics are typically applied to populations that take on a ranked order (such as movie reviews receiving one to four stars). The branch of known as non-parametric statistics is concerned with non-parametric and non-parametric Non-parametric models differ from models in that the model structure is not specified a priori but is instead determined from data. The term nonparametric is not meant to imply that such models completely lack parameters but that the number and nature of the parameters are flexible and not fixed in advance. Nonparametric models are therefore also called distribution free or parameter-free. * A is a simple nonparametric estimate of a probability distribution * provides better estimates of the density than histograms. * and methods have been developed based on,, and Non-parametric (or distribution-free) inferential statistical methodsare mathematical procedures for statistical hypothesis testing which, unlike, make no assumptions about the of the variables being assessed. The most frequently used tests include

Is 12LB fishing line stronger than 10LB fishing line?

Yes; 12 lb. test is stronger than 10 lb. test.

Is chi-square test parametric or non-parametric?

non-parametric I believe the above is a reductionistic assumption bassed upon ill-informed logic. Chi-square is a statistic that is related to the central limit theorem in the sense that proportions are in fact means, and that proportions are normally distributed (with a mean of pi [not 3.141592653...] and a variance of pi*(1-pi)). Therefore, we can perform a normal curve test for examining the difference between proportions such that Z squared = chi square on one degree of freedom. Since Z is indubitably a parametric test, and chi square can be related to Z, we can infer that it is, in fact, parametric. From another approach, a parametric test is a test that makes an assumption about the value of a parameter (the measure of the population rather than your sample) in a statistical density function. Since our expected frequencies are based upon either theory, or a mathematical assumption based upon the average of our presented frequencies, i.e. the mean, we are making an assumption about what the parameter of our distribution would be. Therefore, given this assumption, and the relationship of chi square to the normal curve, one can argue for chi square being a parametric test.

Distinguish between parameteric statistics and non - parameteric statistics?

The simplest answer is that parametric statistics are based on numerical data from which descriptive statistics can be calculated, while non-parametric statistics are based on categorical data. Takes two example questions: 1) Do men live longer than women, and 2), are men or women more likely to be statisticians. In the first example, you can calculate the average life span of both men and women and then compare the two averages. This is a parametric test. But in the second, you cannot calculate an average between "man" and "woman" or between "statistician" or "non-statistician." As there is no numerical data to work with, this would be a non-parametric test. The difference is vitally important. Because inferential statistics require numerical data, it is possible to estimate how accurate a parametric test on a sample is compared to the relevant population. However, it is not possible to make this estimation with non-parametric statistics. So while non-parametric tests are still used in many studies, they are often regarded as less conclusive than parametric statistics. However, the ability to generalize sample results to a population is based on more than just inferential statistics. With careful adherence to accepted random sampling, sample size, and data collection conventions, non-parametric results can still be generalizable. It is just that the accuracy of that generalization can not be statistically verified.

Is ice stronger than fire?

i dont think fire is stronger than ice but thermite is stronger than ice

Is fishing line stronger than string?

Most fishing line is much stronger than common household string. Fishing line comes in many different sizes or "pound test" ratings, ranging from less than 1lb test to well over 100lb test. This rating indicates at what pound of pressure fishing line will break at. So, if you have 17lb test line then it should break around 17lbs of pulling pressure. Keep in mind that the test ratings are sometimes not 100% accurate and lines can break slightly below, right at, or even a bit more than the indicated rating on the package.

Who is stronger vector or sonic?

sonic is stronger than knuckles yes he is stronger than vector

Is Joker stronger than Wesker?

Yes. Wesker is working on a test subject and Joker is crazy. Joker is more entergetic. But Batman is stronger. Wesker is just slow. He would be tired of fighting Joker.

Is water stronger than glass?

Sometimes water can be stronger than glass but most times glass can be stronger than water.

Why hydrogen bond in water is stronger than in HF and NH3?

It doesn't, HF is stronger than H2O which is stronger than NH3

Does Venus have stronger gravity?

Stronger gravity than what? The gravity of Venus is stronger than that of the moon or of Mars, but weaker than that of Earth.

Is romeo stronger than Juliet in the anime romeo x Juliet?

Brute strength he is stronger than her especially in the end of the series he is stronger than esculaus meaning he becomes stronger than most men

Is the tiger stronger than a shark?

Sharks are stronger than tigers because of their amazing massive bite. They can bite stronger than tigers. Weird but true: Sharks are 2510 times stronger than tigers!

Pound for pound is wood stronger than steel?

no wood is not stronger than steel. yes becasue steel is stronger than wood.

At a drug test for a job will they see if a male uses female pee to pass the test?

yes male pee is much stronger, smarter, and generally more agreable than female pee.

Are cougars stronger than bears?

Bears are stronger than cougars

Why is steel stronger than aluminum?

why is steel stronger than aluminium?

Is lightning stronger than fire?

Nothing is stronger than fire.

Is Mewtwo stronger than Celebi?

Celebi is stronger than mewtwo

Is nagato stronger than Naruto?

no, naruto is stronger than nagato

Is a Dalek stronger than a Toclafane?

Daleks are stronger than Toclafanes.

Is piccolo stronger than Goku?

no no no piccolo is not stronger than goku

Is Tylenol 4 stronger than narco?

Norco is "stronger" than Tylenol 4.