You would measure a rice plant (or perhaps the length of a rice field) in meters.
You would generally measure a container of rice grains (for cooking or eating) in kilograms, unless you were concerned about how much space it would take up on a shelf or something like that.
You don't. Meter is used to measure length, kilogram is for mass.You don't. Meter is used to measure length, kilogram is for mass.You don't. Meter is used to measure length, kilogram is for mass.You don't. Meter is used to measure length, kilogram is for mass.
you dont. kilogram is a measure of weight and meter is a measure of distance
It is not possible to give a sensible answer to the question. A square metre is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space whereas the mass of rice depends on the volume - a 3-dimensional measure - of rice. The height of the pile of rice will affect the mass of rice.
A kilogram is a measure of volume and a meter is a measure of length. The two do not match up.
A meter. A kilogram is a unit of mass, not of length.
Kilogram/liter, or kilogram/cubic meter.
Meter Kilogram Second Ampere
* 1 kilogram=1000 grams * 1 meter=100 centimeters
Length: meter Mass: kilogram Volume: cubic meter
Neither is "largest" - a Kilogram is a measure of MASS, 1000 grams. Little over two pounds. A Meter is a measure of LENGTH, a little over a yard. Therefore, there is no way to say one is "larger" than the other. Unless you mean a square meter, and to find out if a kilogram or square meter of a substance is larger you would have to know the substance's density.
that cant be answered because a meter measures distance and a kilogram measures weight
There can be no conversion.A kilogram is a measure of mass. A cubic metre is a measure of volume. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid.