you know if ur lasy and lookn 4 da answer lik me u better figure it out or ask a teacher cause i dont no
No
Yes and unlike the Hindu-Arabic numeral system a nought figure is not required for place value purposes because the place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
So as to read out the numerals in a logical descending order as for example MDCLXVI = 1666
It is O because it's not needed in the Roman numeral system for place value purposes as the place value of the numerals are self evident
No, the Roman numeral system is not a place value system. In the Roman numeral system, each individual symbol represents a specific value, and there is no concept of place value. Place value systems, such as the decimal system, rely on the position of digits within a number to determine their value.
No
The place value of Roman numerals are self evident that's why the system doesn't need a zero figure for positional place value purposes which is essential in the Hindu-Arabic numeral system.
Yes and unlike the Hindu-Arabic numeral system a nought figure is not required for place value purposes because the place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
So as to read out the numerals in a logical descending order as for example MDCLXVI = 1666
It is O because it's not needed in the Roman numeral system for place value purposes as the place value of the numerals are self evident
No, the Roman numeral system is not a place value system. In the Roman numeral system, each individual symbol represents a specific value, and there is no concept of place value. Place value systems, such as the decimal system, rely on the position of digits within a number to determine their value.
Yes and a nought figure is not needed to represent the positional place value of Roman numerals because their positional place values are self evident.
A nought figure is not needed in the Roman numeral system because the positional place value of these numerals are self evident. A nought figure is needed in the Arabic numeral system (the numbers we use today) to identify the positional place value of these numerals.
Yes
It contains a zero figure for place value purposes thus limiting the size of numerals for a given value. Foe example in Hindu-Arabic numerals 88 only uses two numerals but the same value in Roman numerals is LXXXVIII which uses eight numerals.
Yes but unlike the Hindu-Arabic numeral system which requires a 0 symbol for positional place value purposes the Roman numeral system does not need a 0 symbol because the positional place value of these numerals are self evident.
Try adding 2 to 4 in Roman numerals: IV + II =? Or adding 1 to 8: VIII + I =?