That's false.
It is true.
That depends - unfortunately, "whole number" is ambiguous, and can mean different things to different people. If by "whole number" you mean "natural number", then both are of course the same. If you choose to include negative numbers in your definition of "whole number", i.e., whole numbers = integers, then the two sets are not the same, and the proposed statement is false.
It depends, many people do count 0 as a natural number, but MOST do not. So for most HS text book, the answer is NO, all whole numbers are not natural numbers and the reason is 0 is a whole number but not a natural number.
Yes all counting numbers are whole numbers, but the reverse is not true (zero!)
yes but only whole numbers for example 2 - 3 - 6 - 9 - 54 - 111 are all integers 2.5 - 6.9 - 8.1 are not
true
No, integers are positive and negative whole numbers
yes
Yes, it is true.
dont know
True--all positive whole numbers and all negative whole numbers and zero are the integers.
An integer is by definition a whole number.
Rational numbers are a subset of real numbers. They are ratios of the form x/y where x and y are integers (y ≠0). Their decimal representation are either terminating or infinitely recurring.
That's a true statement. Another true statement is: All integers are rational numbers.
It is not true.
No.
No, Associative proporties are not true for all integers. The deffinition for integer (n) 1. one of the positive or negative numbers 1, 2, 3, act., or zero. Compare whole number.