There is no intrinsic relationship between mass and length or diameter. A line segment or diameter has no mass. So you can double its length and the mass remains unchanged.
You cannot, there is no single-rule, formulaic relationship between mass and physical measurements like length or diameter.
There is no direct relationship between length and mass.
There is no relationship between units of mass and either length of capacity. Units of capacity are the cubed units of length.
more mass the longer the spring
You cannot. Diameter and length can, for some particular shapes, give you the volume. But that will not give you the mass unless you know the density of the substance.
well the relationship between mass and force is..........*relationship... Force=mass x acceleration
well the relationship between mass and force is..........*relationship... Force=mass x acceleration
Yes, but to be precise, the surface gravity depends on the mass AND on the diameter. Or alternatively, on the density AND on the diameter.
Mass, length and time are the three fundamental units of physics. None of them have a relationship with another, unless some other factor is introduced from outside. What relationship might come from this can't be guessed at without knowing what the other factor is.
There's no relationship between length and mass, and they can't be converted to each other.
Indeed there is a relationship. Density is equal to the mass divided by the volume (height times width times length). So, height is equal to mass divided by (height times length times width) or H= M/(HLW)
Describe the relationship between mass and weight.