answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Well, the correct answer is 11. At least according to the link I added.

Unfortunately, I can't find a proof why. Most theorems about primes run really deep, and it's often hard to find simple intuitive arguemts for questions just like this (the Goldbach conjecture is very similar to this, but has remained unsolved for several centuries.)

This question is closely related to the concept of a complete sequence, which is a sequence which 'has enough' terms so that every positive integer can be expressed as the sum of elements in the sequence, without repeating elements.

A classic proof about the prime numbers, called Bertrand's Postulate, demonstrates that there is always a Prime number between n and 2n, for any positive integer n greater than 1.

While I can't give the proof, Bertrand's postulate basically implies that there are 'enough' primes so that, if we include the number 1, the sequence of prime numbers forms a complete sequence.

Of course, for this question, 1 is not included. So that means we don't have a complete sequence. However, apparently the sequence is 'complete' if we only consider numbers greater than 11. As the sequence of primes and 1 is complete, for any number there will be a set of unique primes and maybe 1 that add to this number. What the solution to this question says is that, for any number greater than 11, if the sum of primes and possible 1 which adds up to that number does in fact contain 1, then there will exist another sum of primes which does not contain 1. Perhaps we can take away the 1 and turn a 2 into a 3, leaving the same number as the sum. Or maye take away the 1 and add 7, then find a prime number that is in the sum that, if we take away 6, gives another prime number. To be honest I'm not quite sure how to prove this final little bit either...

* * * * *

Not the correct answer for the question that was asked - which specified two OR MORE primes. 11 = 2+2+7. If the Goldbach conjecture is correct the answer is 3 (nb: 1 is not a prime).

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Goldbach said: Every even integer greater than 2 can be expressed as the sum of two primes.

Another "version" of this says every integer greater than 5 can be written as the sum of 3 primes.

However, you are just asking for the largest integer that is NOT the sum of two or more primes. The number 3 is an integer and it is the sum of 2 which is prime and 1 which is composite. The numbers 4 and 5 certainly don't work so we can stop there using the second version of Goldbach. The number 2 is 1 +1 and that works, but 3 is larger.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Largest integer that is not the sum of two or more different primes?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

The largest integer that is not the product of two or more different primes?

The largest integer that is not the product of two or more different primes would be the largest prime number. Because there are an infinite number of prime numbers, there is no largest integer that is not the product of two or more different primes.


The largest integer that is not the sum of two or more different primes?

2


What is the largest integer that is not the sum of two or more different primes?

This is not known for sure, but if Goldbach's conjectures are true, then 2.


What number has the most prime factors?

Hi... Every integer can be expressed as the product of prime numbers (and these primes are it's factors). Since we can multiply any integer by 2 to create a larger integer which can also be expressed as the product of primes, and this number has more prime factors than the last, we can always get a bigger number with more prime factors. Therefore, there is no definable number with the most primes (much like there is no largest number)!


What is the largest integer number?

There is no such thing as the "largest" integer. Whatever integer you name, no matter how big it is, I can always add ' 1 ' to it ... or any other integer ... and get as many more as I want, that are all larger than your number.


Why is there is no largest positive integer?

Because whatever integer lays claim to that title is smaller than "one more".


What is the largest remainder possible if a number is divided by 11?

The largest [integer] remainder is 10. If the remainder was any more you would get one (or more) lots of 11.


What is the world's largest prime number?

This is a good question, alas, it is unanswerable, as numbers are infinite and more primes are being found every day.


What is the name of the 5 primes?

theres more than 5 primes. but five primes are 2,3,5,7,11. amd theres also 23,29,31,37, and so on.


What is the largest integer that can divide evenly into 2 or more numbers?

I think you are referring to the Greatest Common Factor of two numbers.


Find the largest of three consecutive even integers if the sum of the 2 smaller integers is 16 more than the largest integer What is the largest of the 3 integers?

Let the smallest integer be 2n, the next integer is 2n + 2, and the largest one is 2n + 4. Then, we have:2n + (2n + 2) = (2n + 4) + 164n + 2 = 2n + 202n = 18 the smallest integer2n + 2 = 18 + 2 = 20 the next one2n + 4 = 18 + 4 = 22 the largest integerCheck


How many pairs of coprime primes are there between 1 and 50?

All pairs of two primes are coprime. There are fifteen primes under 50. So that means there are 105 unique pairs of "coprime primes", or more generally, pairs of primes, under 50.