The smallest consecutive three numbers that total 120 are... 39, 40 & 41.
The smallest is 15.
The sum is always 3 more than (triple the smallest number).
The smallest is 14.
The smallest of the three is 13.
The smallest of the three numbers is 22.
No, it is impossible.
No. The sum of four consecutive integers is two odd numbers plus two even numbers which is an even number. 2001 is an odd number, therefore it cannot be the sum of four consecutive numbers.
There are no four consecutive whole numbers that add up to 35. The sum of two consecutive [whole] numbers is an even number plus an odd number which is an odd number. The sum of two consecutive numbers and the two next consecutive numbers is the sum of two odd numbers which is even, but 35 is odd, so no four consecutive whole numbers cannot add up to 35.
49 and 51
No, the sum of two consecutive numbers is always an odd number, and is not divisible by two.
The sum of consecutive numbers (starting with 1), is the square of the number of terms you sum, in this case 1600. 1600^2 = 2,560,000
The numbers are 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22.
Sorry. No sum of even numbers can be an odd number.
There are no two consecutive numbers that equal 70 because the sum of any two consecutive numbers is an odd number.
The sum of 3 consecutive whole numbers is always equal to 3 times the middle number in that sequence.
The numbers are 30 and 31.
Their sum is three times the middle number.