False:
Ratio areas= 16 : 64
= 1 : 4
Ratio of sides = sqrt(ratio of areas)
= 1 : 2
The fact that corresponding angles are congruent does not require corresponding sides to be proportional - except in the case of a triangle. For quadrilaterals, think of a square and rectangle.
area of triangle 1 would be 16 and the other triangle is 9 as the ratio of areas of triangles is the square of their similar sides
(16" x 16") = 256 square inches(256 square inches) / (144 square inches per square foot) = 1 and 7/9 square feet
square, rectangle, rhombus, parallelogram
3 square inches = 19.35 square centimetres.
No. You could, for example, have a square and a rhombus with sides twice as large.
Areas are proportional to the square of corresponding sides. Therefore, in this case: * Divide 144 by 36. * Take the square root of the result. That will give you the ratio of the corresponding sides.
The fact that corresponding angles are congruent does not require corresponding sides to be proportional - except in the case of a triangle. For quadrilaterals, think of a square and rectangle.
Similar polygons have congruent angles and the same shape (but not necessarily the same size). Since the shape of a square and a rectangle is different from the shape of a trapezoid, they are not similar to it.
Similar figures are polygons with the same shape but a different size. eg: 5cm square compared to a 10cm square = similar figures. Same shape but different size.
No. Consider a square and rectangle.
Two polygons are similar if they meet the following criteria. They must have the same number of sides. Each vertex of one polygon has a corresponding vertex on the other polygon with same angle measurement. Each side on one polygon is proportional to a corresponding side on the other one by the same scalar multiple. If the two polygons are triangles, then if angle criteria is satisfied the side proportion will automatically be satisfied. The converse is true as well. For other polygons, both sides and angles must be tested. An example would be a square and a rhombus.
No, similar pentagons (or any polygon for that matter) must have corresponding congruent angles and all sides must be proportional to its corresponding sides. For example, if a square with a triangle on it is a pentagon, then a regular pentagon would not be similar to it (because corresponding angles are not congruent).
Not to the square root, but to the square.
Both rectangles and squares are polygons. A square is a special case of a rectangle.
Squares are polygons, but not all polygons are squares.
the answer is a square