0
Use inductive reasoning to find a pattern and then make a reasonable conjecture for the next number in the sequence 1 3 7 13 15 19 25 27 31 37?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
39
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do you work out nth term in sequence 26 17 8 -1 and -10?
you can find the rest of the numbers in the sequence by using inductive reasoning or noticing a pattern 26 , 17 , 8 , -1 , -10 it appears that you are subracting 9 each time. 26-9=17 17-9=8 8-9=-1 (8-9 changes to 8+-9 if you need to see that step) -1-9=-10 (-1-10 changes to -1+-9 if you need to see that)
What is a theorem?
A theorem is a math term used to describe an idea that can be proved.A mathematical statement which has been proved trueIt is a statement or proposition which can be derived from a set of axioms and following a sequence of logical reasoning.
What are the sequence to be followed to sequence service?
sequence of service
How do you get the sequence of 3354435543?
3354435543 is a single number, it is not a sequence.3354435543 is a single number, it is not a sequence.3354435543 is a single number, it is not a sequence.3354435543 is a single number, it is not a sequence.
What is A sequence of numbers such that the difference of any two successive members of the sequence is a constant?
An arithmetic sequence.
Se inductive reasoning to find a pattern and then make a resonable conjecture for the next number in the sequence 11 12 9 10 7 8 5 6?
The pattern is that for the first number, add 1. For the second number, subtract. Repeat to negative infinity. So the next number will be 3.
Using inductive reasoning to find a pattern and then make a reason conjecture for the next number in the sequence 1 3 7 13 15 19 25 27 31 37?
The pattern is add 2, add 4, add 6, add 2, add 4, add 6 and so forth. Based on this pattern the next number is 39.
What reasonable conjecture for the next number in the sequence11 12 9 10 7 8 5 6?
The next number would be 3. The sequence (starting at 11) is add one, then subtract three.
Does the power factor in three phase system depend on the phase sequence?
No. It depends on the inductive and capacitive reactance of the load.
How do you work out nth term in sequence 26 17 8 -1 and -10?
you can find the rest of the numbers in the sequence by using inductive reasoning or noticing a pattern 26 , 17 , 8 , -1 , -10 it appears that you are subracting 9 each time. 26-9=17 17-9=8 8-9=-1 (8-9 changes to 8+-9 if you need to see that step) -1-9=-10 (-1-10 changes to -1+-9 if you need to see that)
What is a backward induction?
A backward induction is a process of reasoning backwards in time, from the end of a problem, in order to determine a sequence of actions to be taken.
What is the natural generalization of the Collatz conjecture?
Let f be a function that maps integers to integers such that f(x) = x/2 if x is even, and f(x) = 3x + 1 if x is odd. The generalization of the Collatz conjecture is that when creating a sequence by iterating over f, all such sequences eventually end in a cycle.
What is the correct order for the inductive writing sequence?
Buffer, reasons, bad news, counterproposal, and desire to continue the relationship
What is the next in this sequence of 3 5 15 75?
3 5 15 75 1125 Assuming the following reasoning is correct: 3x5=15 5x15=75 15x75=1125
What is a theorem?
A theorem is a math term used to describe an idea that can be proved.A mathematical statement which has been proved trueIt is a statement or proposition which can be derived from a set of axioms and following a sequence of logical reasoning.
Do the theorems for junior certificate maths have to be exactly right or do they just have to make sense?
There is more than one way to prove a given mathematical proposition. If the sequence of reasoning is valid, then the proof is correct. That is all that is required.
Is a scientific model is a specific set of steps that a scientist folows to reach a conclusion?
A scientific model is a theoretical explanation of some phenomenon; the model is the conclusion, it is not the steps by which the conclusion was reached. The sequence of reasoning would just be called a scientific argument.
