If I understand the question correctly, it is when the algebraic equation (or inequality) is true.
The question contains an algebraic expression but there is no equation to solve.
please answer the question.
The question contains an algebraic expression but, since there is no equality sign, there is no equation to solve.
It is an algebraic variable. There is no equation which can be seen in the question and so there is nothing which can be solved.
The answer depends on the equation which is not specified in the question.
The question consists of an algebraic expression. There is no equation nor inequality which may be solved.
I believe the answer to the question your asking is very simple. x=3 infers an algebraic equation, such as: 9-x=6 . x3 however, infers 3 times x, x being the variable your are solving for.
The question "4.8 is 15 of what" can be translated into an algebraic equation which would be, 15x = 4.8 To solve this equation, divide both sides by 15 and you get x = 4.8/15 = .32 which is the answer.
The question contains an algebraic expression. It is not an equation (or inequality) and so cannot be solved.
The sequence in the question is NOT an arithmetic sequence. In an arithmetic sequence the difference between each term and its predecessor (the term immediately before) is a constant - including the sign. It is not enough for the difference between two successive terms (in any order) to remain constant. In the above sequence, the difference is -7 for the first two intervals and then changes to +7.
A single number, such as 11111, cannot define an arithmetic sequence. On the other hand, it can be the first element of any kind of sequence. On the other hand, if the question was about ``1, 1, 1, 1, 1'' then that is an arithmetic sequence as there is a common difference of 0 between each term.
naku simple and arithmetic questions and answers
There is no way to answer your question. It is not an equation, because there is no equal sign. There is no explanation if it is a sequence of arithmetic or geometric numbers. There is nothing to go on to solve for a value of B.
There is insufficient information to answer this question. Placing a question mark at the end of a set of algebraic terms which don't even make up an equation or inequality does not make it a sensible question. Please edit the question to include more context or relevant information.
This question is impossible to answer without knowing the difference between successive terms of the progression.
Question is not complete!
Follow this procedure: 1). Ask a question. (You haven't done that yet.) 2). Consider the equation as it relates to the question. 3). Operate on the equation, always using legitimate algebraic manipulations, so as to rearrange the equation, or isolate the variables, as required to answer the specific question that has been asked. That's the best way to "work it out".
Without the context of this question, it is difficult to provide an appropriate answer. Mathematically, this sentence could be represented by the algebraic equation, "3H - 233".
"1 plus 1" has no variable, no "equals" sign, and no unknown. It's not an equation, and it asks no question. In order to come up with an "answer", one would first have invent a question. "1 plus 1" is at best an arithmetic expression with a numerical value of 2.
"take away 6 from 5 times of g" gives an algebraic expression, not an equation or inequality. An expression cannot be solved.
Do you have a specific problem for this question? Because when a question asks for you to "solve for p" they will put it in the form of an algebraic equation, for example, 1 + p = 5 .. In that case you are trying to find out all the values for p which would fit in, here being 4.