Positives:
Negatives:
you would convert it buy using specific gravity. the specific gravity of fuel oil is 0.893 at 60F. so that said 1 liter of furnace oil would weigh 893g. one metric tonne of furnace oil would equal roughly 1120 liters
Modernly yes but technically no because, because new sources of energy that are renewable are tacking over the long reign of oil, even though it is a vital nececcity like water to us human.
That's difficult to accomplish without getting breading crumbs and frying oil all over the fractions. It takes a steady hand and frequent clean-up.
Not sure if this is a math/ statistics question. Reserves are assets you hold, but are not using immediately. There are oil reserves, mineral reserves (like gold reserves) and cash reserves. I think you need to rephrase the question for a proper answer.
That depends on what your graph is showing about the USA, compared to the other countries. Your graph may be showing fraction of world population, fraction of world GDP, fraction of world energy consumption, fraction of the world's Jews, fraction of the world's oil production, fraction of world oil refineries, etc. The USA section on each one would be different.
Three advantages of burning oil products would be that they are cheaper, burn quickly, produce a lot of energy and are available until they are gone. These advantages don't out weigh the negatives.
Alternative Energy
From a survey of 100 people 78% of them would not like a wind farm near them. But most of them don't mind it being anywhere else. Maybe for these negatives and positives... Positives, - low maintenance, no by product (think nuclear) energy. flexible locations, long term, sustainable and consistent. Negative - affects local landscape, doesn't work in slow wind OR too faster winds(!), no jobs provided, the oil companies barely get anything from it.
it is burnt using heat
In the meaning of helping people, yes coal offers plenty of positive things. Also many negative things. Positives: - It can be used as an energy source - It is an abundant fossil fuel - It can be used for many different things, oil etc. Negatives: - It isn't a clean burning fossil fuel - When its burnt it releases bukus amounts of Co2 Thanks -xQ
yes
Perhaps the most positives in the Russian economy are its natural gas and oil reserves. Russia has a steady amount of customers in Europe for these energy products.
make your food wooptanggood on frie rice.you get heffa.
If you do not want to use oil as an energy source, no one is forcing you to do so. You don't have to add a chemical to oil to prevent yourself from using it. Perhaps you intend to add a chemical to someone else's oil, to prevent them from using it, but that would be vandalism.In broad social terms, if you would like people in general to stop using oil as an energy source, the best way to accomplish that is to support or introduce other, better energy sources, such as solar power. Oil will still have important uses in the petrochemical industry even if it is not used as an energy source.
37%
You don't 'save' energy by using these methods, you save non renewable resources, such as coal, oil and gas.
When burning oil, it gives of a lot of energy that we harvest for daily life (ex: Transportation)