No, 3 isn't a multiple of 6 because the first multiple of 6 is 6. 3 is a factor of 6. 6 is a multiple of 3.
Three is not a multiple of six. Six is a multiple of three. And three is a factor of six.
Think of any multiple of three. That number plus three is the next-higher multiple of three. Right? For example, 12 is a multiple of 3 (3 x 4). Add 3 and you get 15 (3 x 5). So 15 - 3 = a multiple of 3. Same thing will work with ANY multiple of 3, no matter how high you go. Can you see why?
No, 28 could not be a multiple of 3.No. 28 divided by three is not a whole number, so it is not a multiple of three.
Three is a multiple of 3.
The digits of a multiple of three sum to a multiple of three. for 342, 3+4+2 = 9 Since 9 is a multiple of three, 342 is as well. It is the product of 114 and 3
Yes 642 is a multiple of three
If the sum of the digits is a multiple of three, the whole number is a multiple of three.
To be a multiple of 6 a number must be even and a multiple of 3.356 is not a multiple of three. The short cut to that is if the digits add up to a multiple of three then the original number is a multiple of 3.
If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.If you take three consecutive odd (or three consecutive even) numbers, one of the three will always be a multiple of 3.
No (12 can be divided by three but not by eight) 24 is the lowest multiple of 3 & 8
Three is not a multiple of 6 because you can't multiply 6 by a whole number and get the answer 3.