The actual term is "effective range". That is the range where a trained shooter can consistently hit the target. For example- a 9mm pistol has an effective range of about 50 meters. However, it can shoot a bullet about 960 meters. But at that range, you will not consistently hit anything- except the earth.
It will be accurate at any range- however, I think you mean at what range will the point of aim and point of impact be the same. It will vary depending on the cartridge you use, barrel length, and scope height- BUT- assuming an average 30-06 load, with a scoped rifle, a 35 yard zero will have point of impact meeting point of aim at ABOUT 200 yards.
It gives an indication of the spread in the values: are they all very close to the mean value or scattered across a wide range of values? That is important in determining how accurate your point estimate of the mean is.
Accuracy depends on what you are trying to measure.As a measure of central tendency, the range is totally useless because it is not a measure of central tendency. As a measure of spread (dispersion), it is the most accurate because it is the only one that measures spread: the other threee are totally useless.With nominal data, the median and mean are not defined and so cannot be accurate.And so on.Accuracy depends on what you are trying to measure.As a measure of central tendency, the range is totally useless because it is not a measure of central tendency. As a measure of spread (dispersion), it is the most accurate because it is the only one that measures spread: the other threee are totally useless.With nominal data, the median and mean are not defined and so cannot be accurate.And so on.Accuracy depends on what you are trying to measure.As a measure of central tendency, the range is totally useless because it is not a measure of central tendency. As a measure of spread (dispersion), it is the most accurate because it is the only one that measures spread: the other threee are totally useless.With nominal data, the median and mean are not defined and so cannot be accurate.And so on.Accuracy depends on what you are trying to measure.As a measure of central tendency, the range is totally useless because it is not a measure of central tendency. As a measure of spread (dispersion), it is the most accurate because it is the only one that measures spread: the other threee are totally useless.With nominal data, the median and mean are not defined and so cannot be accurate.And so on.
right correct accurate
The mean is 3. The range is 4.
There is no such thing as a "killing range" for a firearm.
For long range and/or very accurate shooting yes, sort of. You take a deep breath, let about half of it out, then fire the gun. If you are shooting close range self defense shooting, this is not as important because you don't have to be quite that accurate.
The velocity, weight and shape of the bullet, and the density of air through which the bullet moves changes a firearm's range.
The practice itself is legal. If you're looking for a range which offers firearm rentals for their range, see the related link.
The rifle greatly increased the usable range of a firearm over that of the smoothbore musket. This made changes in both the military use of firearms, and in the use of firearms for hunting. Where a smoothbore musket has an accurate range of about 50 yards, the rifle, in the hands of an experienced marksman, had a usable range of about 400 yards.
Up and down range.
Generally, yes, although it really depends on the tolerances of the firearm.
No. A background check is required to purchase a firearm from a dealer. If you are renting a firearm to use at a range, they may choose to run a background check.
Determines the use of the firearm.
velocity
Cartridge
no a fellon cant touch a firearm