answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The answer depends on what is already known about the two triangles.

User Avatar

Wiki User

āˆ™ 9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What else would need to be congruent to show that ABCis congruent toXYZ by SAS?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What else would need to be congruent to show that efg is congruent to hij by sss?

SSS is enough to show congruence.


What else would need to be congruent to show that abc congruent xyz by SAS?

__ - __ AC = XZ = is the similar sign


What else would need to be congruent to show that abc def by asa?

Angle "A" is congruent to Angle "D"


What else would need to be congruent to show abc is congruent to def by AAS?

"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.


What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle abc is congruent to xyz by SAS?

"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.


What else would need to congruent to show that abc equals pqr by sss?

That depends on which sides have not been proven congruent yet.


What else would need to be congruent to show that abc xyz by sas?

Line segment BC is congruent to Line Segment YZ


What else would need to be congruent to show that triangle ABC is congruent to triangle XYZ by Angle Side Angle?

Without seeing the picture, I can't tell what's already known to be congruent, so there's no way I can figure out what 'else' is needed.


What else would need to be congruent to show that abc is congruent to xyz by sas?

"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.


What else would need to be congruent to show that STU congruent JKL by sas?

We don't know what has already been proven congruent, sowe're in no position to be able to say what elseis required.


What else would need to be congruent to show that abc is congruent to def by ASA?

"What else" implies there is already something that is congruent. But since you have not bothered to share that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer. no correct


What else would need to be congruent to show that stu jkl by sas?

Su jL