Fault can be assigned to one driver, or to both equally, or to both in percentages, depending on the circumstances and the degree to which each driver contributed to the accident. The court will consider prejudicial factors such as whether laws were broken and who could have best avoided the accident.
Where a driver broke a traffic law, such as backing all the way across a traffic lane, fault would likely be assigned him. But another principle is that anyone who could have acted, but failed to, to avoid the accident, even if in the right as far as traffic regulations are concerned, will be considered fully or at least substantially At Fault.
Whoever is backing up is at fault. No matter what the circumstances. Watchout!! Even if you are involved in a collision with an unlicensed driver who is driving recklessly, if you are backing up it will still be YOUR FAULT ! The question will answer itself if you didn't try to force the wording so much: Don't you think who is at fault "...when you back into the side of some one...." seems pretty clear?
strike slip fault
The official definition for the word blame is "assign responsibility for a fault or wrong."
It the angle between fault current and voltage at the point where the fault occurs.
No. It is a noun. It may be used as an adjective with some other nouns, as in fault line or fault monitoring (the geologic use of the word).
Merits is the opposite word of fault. Wickedness is the opposite of virtue although many people use the words "Virtue" and "Fault" as antonyms. .
Generally, the person backing out is at fault. If you are both backing out you're probably both at fault and will probably share the cost of repair, with each repairing their own. yes because you were backing out and they hit your car its their fault!!!!!!! yes because you were backing out and they hit your car its their fault!!!!!!!
Any time the driver who is backing is at fault, in all 50 states.
Well if you were backing in and hit someone then it is your fault. But if they hit you, then it is their fault.
The car in motion is ALWAYS at fault when it hits a stationary vehicle.
A normal fault is the opposite of a reverse fault.
You are at fault.
If the person backing out of the space had not seen a pedestrian walking the "wrong way" it would be the fault of the driver of the car backing out....... So it is the fault of the person backing out. They did not look to make sure it was safe to do so.
it is ALWAYS the fault of the backing driver. They bear the responsibility to make sure they can back with safety.
Most defintley his fault, you were backing out, he should have saw you first.
In most states, fault lies with the person who had the "last clear chance" to avoid the accident. If you saw the car backing up at you and just sat there and let it hit you, it's your fault. If you saw the car backing up and thought "I can get past them" and instead hit them, it's your fault.
In most circumstances, the backing vehicle has the greater duty of care and would be found at fault.