The answer to that would be 11.11 because you only use the first 2 #s then after that the first 2 #s after the decimal point
Sorry, but it is not possible to use a notation bar with this browser.
No
A non-example of bar notation is writing a repeating decimal without using a bar, such as 0.3333... or 0.142857142857..., where the repeating part is not clearly indicated. In contrast, using bar notation, these would be represented as (0.\overline{3}) or (0.\overline{142857}), respectively. This lack of clarity in indicating the repeating sequence makes it a non-example of bar notation.
3.58 with the bar only over the 8
It is bar 0.58585 :)
2.01 the bar notation is overthe .01
Butghj
Sorry, but it is not possible to use a notation bar with this browser.
In bar notation, it is .42. The bar rests atop the 42.
No
2.16 with a bar on top of the 16
................................................................._0.384333 using the bar notation = 0.3843(the bar should be placed above the repeated decimal. In this case, it should be above the 2nd 3 from the decimal point.
caca
_ 5.921
Refer to the attachment for the answer.
3.58 with the bar only over the 8
It would be 0.7961 with a bar over the 7961. Using dot notation it would be 0.7961 with a dot over the 7 and another dot over the 1.