Study guides

Q: Is a set of happy people a well defined or not?

Write your answer...

Submit

Related questions

Yes, the set of happy people is not well defined.

Yes ! If you have a group of sincerely happy people, you'll notice how calm, relaxed, and friendly they are. They would definitely be very well-defined to others !

Yes, Because they all have the same emotions no one is sad and everyone is happy. -N.C.A

its not well defined because not all the students/people like the teachers,so it is not well defined

its not well defined because not all the students/people like the teachers,so it is not well defined

Elements that have to be defined by personal judgement. Such as the set ofgreat songs is not well-defined. But the set of the English alphabet is well-defined.

its not well defined because not all the students/people like the teachers,so it is not well defined

Big people is a subjective term. This term may mean one thing to someone and another thing to other person. So this set is not well defined.

No, it is not well defined. "Big" means different things to different people. For example, to a toddler, a teenager is big, to an adult a teenager is not.

The description of a well defined set clealy states what is in the set. For example, "deciduous trees" is a set that only includes trees that are deciduous. No conifers or non-deciduous trees are in the set. "Tall trees" is not well defined because the members of the set depends on what "tall" means to different people. Well-defined sets can be illustrated by using pictures of what would be inside and outside a circle to show which would and would not be in the set.

well defined

If there exists even one single item for which you cannot say whether it is in the set or not, the set is not well defined.

A well defined set is one that you know exactly what is meant when you read it. For example, the set of all people 6' 1" tall is well defined. Whenever you meet someone, if they're 6'1" tall, they're in the set. Otherwise, they're not. You know exactly what I mean. So that set is well defined. The set of all cute shoes is not well defined. Jane just adores buckles, so any shoe with a buckle is cute to her. But Martha likes plain shoes. Buckles are big, ugly things that detract from the shoe. So a shoe with a buckle is not cute to Martha. So the set of all cute shoes is not well defined, because you can't just look at it and determine if it belongs in the set. So the set of all buckled shoes would be well defined, but the set of all cute shoes is not.

No, it is not well defined. For example, I enjoy math so math would be an enjoyable subject for me. But many people do not enjoy math, so it would not be an enjoyable subject for them. So this is not a well defined set since the answer would depend upon the person you talked to.

state

It is a set that is well defined.

A set is a well defined collection of elements

a set is a collection of well defined objects

The set is well defined. Whether or not a given integer belongs to the set of prime numbers is clearly defined even if, for extremely large numbers, it may prove impossible to determine the status of that number.

It can only become well defined when you specify what constitutes a big person. Is it over 1.8 metres for example, or over 125 kg? or some other measure.

Any well-defined set of numbers.

Prime numbers have only 2 factors and their set is not well defined because they do not follow an orderly mathematical pattern.

Yes. Even numbers greater than 100 is a well defined set. (Although it is a set with an infinite number of members)

production controls creates a well defined set of procedure for coordinating people ,materials and machinery.

Normally, yes. But if you want to be very pedantic about it, what do you do with transgender people?