No integer satisfies that request.
No.
No, 16 is a multiple of 4. 4 is a factor of 16.
The least common multiple of 4 , 9 , 11 = 396
yesdevide 44 by 11 = 44 X 11 = 44
It is not possible to express something as a sum of whole numbers with no common factor. All whole numbers have at least 1 as a common factor.
4 goes into 74, 18.5 Times so it is not a factor.
No. Any multiple of 4 is automatically also a multiple of 2. This is because 2 is, in turn, a factor of 4.
1 is a factor of 4 that is not a multiple of 2.
176 is a multiple of 4. 176 is a multiple of 11. That makes it a common multiple of 4 and 11.
Factor of 60 but NoT a multiple of 4
factor
No, 80 is a multiple of 4. 4 is a factor of 80.
multiple. 4 is afactor of 24
4 is a factor of 36 and 36 is a multiple of 4
4
No, 16 is a multiple of 4. 4 is a factor of 16.
No - nor is it a factor of 34.
The only prime factor of 4 is 2. No prime number is a multiple of 5.