A statement that two ratios are equal; such as A over B equals C over D
Most likely, a high proprtion of them.
no
fist set up a proprtion. then set up a cross product then you finally get your answer.
Either way is safe, provided you are getting the correct proprtion or mixture required.
height Asians are generally shorter weight and so they are lighter (in proprtion) eyes they have eyes which look 'squinty' to us.
you can set up a proprtion being x/62.5=25/100 then you would cross multiply and it would be 100x=25(62.5) simplified 100x=1562.5 divide both sides by 100 and your percent is 15.625
First you have to set up a proprtion. 45 over x equals x over 5. Then you get x squared equals 225(45*5). Finally you have to find the square root of 225 which is 15.
Direct proportion-is inicated when an increase in one another causes a corresponding increase in the other.Indirect proprtion-is indicated when two quantities are related so that an increase in one causes a corresponding to increase in the other. vice versa.
The coefficient of simple determination tells the proportion of variance in one variable that can be accounted for (or explained) by variance in another variable. The coefficient of multiple determination is the Proportion of variance X and Y share with Z; or proportion of variance in Z that can be explained by X & Y.
There are no published stats on record to answer this question. In a way it ignores the big issue of atheism. The real issue is, how many atheists experience life past death at any age. Atheists cheerfully say 'None'. Though is is hard to prove. Atheists live, of course, for a very similar timespan to other people, thus the proprtion who live to such an age shall be similar to people of other beliefs. I suspect, having said this, that there would be some correlation between atheism and longevity, as atheists tend to some from richer, better educated backgrounds, and thus are more likely to live healthy lifestyles wqith better healthcare. However, this effect is probably not huge. I would be interested to see a study into the matter. == I, too, would be fascinated by a study. All the studies I have seen indicate that the more educated a person is, the more likely they are to be atheist. Since the wealthier sections of society tend to be more educated (because education costs money), it is reasonable to infer that atheists are likely to live longer. This would not be because they are atheist, but would have the same root cause as their education: they are more likely to have come from a wealthy background, and have a higher standard of living, and better access to healthcare.
The terms associated with this phenomenon can be quite difficult to get the grasp of for some reason or another to all students. The best way I can describe this is by starting with the solution. By definition of a solution you have a solute and a solvent. The solute is the substance with the lesser concentration. ( e.g. if you have a solution of Salt Water The NaCl (table salt) is dissolved into the H2O( water) since the Salt is being dissolved it is the solute. If you have 2 solutions of salt water Solution A : 10% salt; 90% Water Solution B : 30% salt and 70% water. The two solutions are obiviouslty not equal in proprtion (if they were they would be Isotonic [ equal concentration amounts of water in both solutions]) A Hypertonic Solution Means that it has a higher concentration of solute then the solution in comparison. in this case the solution B would be hypertonic to Solution A. This because the Solute concentration is higher in B than A. Solution B is the hypotonic to solution A because it has a lower concentration of solute. Osmosis is the diffusion of water across a membrane from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration so since Solution B has a lower concentration of water Solution A will pass water into it going from hypotonic to hypertonic.
Enantiomers are organic compounds in which a carbon atom, known as a chiral carbon, is bonded to four distinct and non-identical alkyl or functional groups (for example, a hydroxyl, a methyl, an ethyl and an amine). This means they can be arranged in two different ways; from the perspective of one of the groups, the other three can either be in one order - "clockwise" - or the opposite - "anticlockwise". This potential difference is important for two reasons: # A pure sample of each enantiomer will bend a ray of polarised light in opposite directions at the same angle. for this reason they are sometimes called optical isomers. Each isomer is labelled according to the direction of the bend (d- and l- for 'left' and 'right'). This property allows a person to work out, from a sample which contains an unknown ratio of the two, the proprtion of each simply by passing a ray of light through and measuring the angle it is bent to. E.g. a 1:1 ratio will not bend the light at all, but a 10:1 may bend light exactly 30o to one side. # Many compounds in the body and nature are enantiomers. Lactic acid is a common example. Some compounds are multiply enantiomeric, as they contain more than one chiral - some can have more than a handful. Because of the way the alkyls/functionals are arranged, use of one enantiomer may be very beneficial, but use of the other is pointless, because the active sites for the area, reaction or cell are removed from where they need to be in order for them to have effect. Some drugs and hormones are known for this reason.