A multiple choice test is usually not valid to determine learning of manipulative skills. Instead, the student should be able to manipulate the items to prove mastery.
A paired samples t-test is an example of parametric (not nonparametric) tests.
N>=30 N at-least greater then 30
The Fisher F-test for Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
an immunoassay test for pregnancy
A test may be reliable in that the methods, calculations, measurements and equipment are all correct. However, if one of the samples is flawed, the test would not be valid.
A test may be reliable but not valid. A test may not be valid but not reliable. For example, if I use a yard stick that is mislabeled to measure the distance from tee to hole in golf on different length holes, the results will be neither reliable nor valid. If you use the same stick to measure football fields that are the same length the result will reliable (repeatable, consistent) but not valid (wrong numbers of yards). There is no test that is unreliable (repeatable, consistent) and valid (measures what we are looking for).
In my view reliable test is always valid.
There is no such valid test, so I would definitely question it.
No
Yes, it would be a valid test.
No
Yes sure. It is valid. It will shows the how fast you are thinking.
No, a single colon in itself is not a valid example of CSS syntax.
A test can be reliable and not valid. A test cannot be valid and not reliable.
To ensure that the results are valid. That's the whole point of a science test. The test must be able to be repeated and have the same result to start being considered valid.
Iodoform test is valid only for ethanol.